Scaff
Moderator
- 29,760
- He/Him
- ScaffUK
They should have changed the charges once the video of Rittenhouse threatening to get his AR and shoot someone was excluded. With that video, I think the initial charges made a lot of sense, the moment it was excluded (and the victims were no longer allowed to be called victims, a court failed to work out how to tell the time, the Judge slipped into 'I'm not racist, but.. mode, etc.) they were on a hiding to nothing.... I think the prosecution over-charged to start with ... & then conducted an inept prosecution. Kyle Rittenhouse's crime was injecting himself & his gun into a situation where bad outcomes were very likely. But I don't think he did it out of malicious intent & had no desire or expectation that he would end up shooting anyone. That things spiralled out of control was predictable, but I guess not to a naive 17 year old. I think the prosecution should have opted for lesser charges to start with & presented a case that focused on those.
On to the Arbery case.![]()
I'm both and for a very long time felt more European than British.You're not ... you're British.![]()
Last edited: