R5
(Banned)
- 7,527
- Location, Location
The Spiritual concept actually looks better than the new MINI IMO.Thank goodness none of these vehicles made it into production
The Spiritual concept actually looks better than the new MINI IMO.Thank goodness none of these vehicles made it into production
Suited the late 90s much more like the classic Mini suited the 60s than the retro-styled cash-grab that we ended up with.The Spiritual concept actually looks better than the new MINI IMO.
Yep, there was one in a dealership nearby a while ago and it had zero presence, just a bunch of pretentious "Oh ees a jet fighter really!" lines. The roadster's rear works well and the SV makes more sense but none are really that amazing to look at.
o_O That's a Focus?! How the heck did Ford get the Focus from being a 2-seater sports car to this?I present to you the 1992 Ford Focus Concept.
I think it's by name only.o_O That's a Focus?! How the heck did Ford get the Focus from being a 2-seater sports car to this?
*cough* *cough* Mustang *cough* *cough*o_O That's a Focus?! How the heck did Ford get the Focus from being a 2-seater sports car to this?
Eh, it probably is, this just surprised me.I think it's by name only.
*cough* *cough* Mustang *cough* *cough*
The Mustang still has some sports car traits.
Yeah, I know, it just tickled me.The keyword is "some".
That's largely a product of evolution. Early Mustangs, such as the one that came immediately after the mid-engined, V4 concept were based on the Falcon. There was nothing sporting about it*, aside from the fact that it had a convertible option like numerous sporting cars. Similar can be said for the first Corvettes, as they were based on large passenger cars--though, the inline 6 in it was set back almost entirely behind the front axle centerline like select few true sports cars of the period (and even since).Especially with the more modern models that outrun actual sports cars on various road courses.
Honestly, I thought the styling was sporty looking to be honest, not just because of the convertible option, but yeah I guess there wasn't much performance oriented about it when it first came out. I was thinking more about the Shelby GT350 and the Boss 302; the 2 track-focused Mustangs from that era.That's largely a product of evolution. There was nothing sporting about it*, aside from the fact that it had a convertible option like numerous sporting cars.
I was thinking more about the Shelby GT350
I think the Focus might actually be closer to the Focus concept.The GT-350 began as a white Mustang 2+2 fastback delivered to Shelby-American's small Venice, California, shop with Ford's "Hi-Performance" 289 V-8 and four-speed manual gearbox options. Shelby applied a "High-Riser" manifold, big four-barrel carb, hot cam, and free-flow exhaust headers, plus trailing arms to locate a rear axle borrowed from Ford's big Galaxie to replace the stock, light-duty Falcon assembly. This brought bigger drum brakes in the rear that Shelby fitted with metallic linings, while Kelsey-Hayes disc brakes were used in front.
Also installed were Koni adjustable shocks, quick-ratio steering box, front anti-sway bar, a stout steel-tube underhood brace, and 15-inch cast-aluminum wheels with high-performance Goodyear tires. Finally, the front suspension's forward mounts were relocated for optimum geometry. The result of all this was near-neutral handling instead of the standard Mustang's strong understeer -- plus ferocious performance with 306 rated horsepower, versus the factory's 271.
Outside, the Mustang's prancing pony was relocated on the grille, the stock steel hood was replaced by a fiberglass replica with functional scoop, and broad blue racing stripes were applied to rocker panels and atop hood, roof, and trunklid. Inside were racing seatbelts, wood-rim steering wheel, full instrumentation -- and no back seat, in order to qualify the GT-350 as a "sports car" under SCCA rules.
HowStuffWorks
I guess it is when you put it that way.I think the Focus might actually be closer to the Focus concept.
Lingenfelter T/A Concept
No mate, it's just a case of Chinese style imitation i'm afraid:Whaaat. I always felt the Ghibli looked great. Only Maserati I didn't like the looks of was the Gran Turismo.
What? The Ghibli looks magnificent. It's quite easily the best looking car in its class.Seen it on the streets a couple of times, thought it made a good candidate for this thread:
Maserati Ghibli:
So, they're all 4-door saloons, of course they look bit like each other. I admit that the front bumper in it and in the BMW may be slightly similar, but that's about it. And the back looks nothing like the Lexus.No mate, it's just a case of Chinese style imitation i'm afraid:
+
= Ghibli
Maserati should be ashamed, especially being Italian.
It's an ugly disproportionate copycat car and you know it!What? The Ghibli looks magnificent. It's quite easily the best looking car in its class.
So, they're all 4-door saloons, of course they look bit like each other. I admit that the front bumper in it and in the BMW may be slightly similar, but that's about it. And the back looks nothing like the Lexus.
Opinions are opinions. There's nothing wrong with not liking it, but saying that they've just copied design from a BMW that was released a year after the Ghibli, and a Lexus that looks nothing like it in any other way but the colour, is hardly correct. The only car they could have really copied when making it is the Quatroporte, and the two have short time gap between their release, so it's not unlikely that they copied each other when the cars were on the drawing board.It's an ugly disproportionate copycat car and you know it!
It's an ugly disproportionate car and you know it!Opinions are opinions. There's nothing wrong with not liking it, but saying that they've just copied design from a BMW that was released a year after the Ghibli, and a Lexus that looks nothing like it in any other way but the colour, is hardly correct. The only car they could have really copied when making it is the Quatroporte, and the two have short time gap between their release, so it's not unlikely that they copied each other when the cars were on the drawing board.
Not to mention the fact, being similar is hardly ever a good reason to call anything ugly. It's like calling the younger sibling ugly because she/he looks too much like her/his older siblings.
No, I really don't. I know you think it's an ugly disproportionate car, but that doesn't make it a generally known fact to which some people just happen say they don't agree to piss off other people on the internet.It's an ugly disproportionate car and you know it!
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, so facts do not matter regarding this subject anyhow. I don't really understand that last sentence to be honest but lets not ramble on here and just agree to disagree.No, I really don't. I know you think it's an ugly disproportionate car, but that doesn't make it a generally known fact that some people just happen say they don't agree to piss off other people on the internet.
Wait, THAT WAS A FORD FOCUS?
Ugh, and since we going with theme of concepts now...it would be a crime to not show this.
The front is not too bad, but the area of the windshield and those rear fenders, I don't like it too much. Then again, if you think that beautiful, that's like, your opinion. Honest.Come on! The PT Spyder is a beautiful car.
The front is not too bad, but the area of the windshield and those rear fenders, I don't like it too much. Then again, if you think that beautiful, that's like, your opinion. Honest.
Now, I found one a few or some can agree.
The R-Class. Those headlights, don't really go well...and how it looks on the backside of the car is....eehh. Certainly not one of the decent looking mercedes out there.