the "just plain ugly" car thread

I present to you the 1992 Ford Focus Concept.

up62333-post-61-1263734629.jpg

1992-Ghia-Focus-02.jpg


giphy.gif
 
Yep, there was one in a dealership nearby a while ago and it had zero presence, just a bunch of pretentious "Oh ees a jet fighter really!" lines. The roadster's rear works well and the SV makes more sense but none are really that amazing to look at.

Had one following me down the road a few months back. In Jet black with that V12 rumbling away, the Aventador has plenty of presence in your rear view mirror.
Still not as pretty as the Murci or as downright gorgeous as the Miura, or as bonkers as the Countach or Diablo.
 
o_O That's a Focus?! How the heck did Ford get the Focus from being a 2-seater sports car to this?
2000_ford_focus_3dr_cpe_zx3_dk_green_99019546179610802.jpg
*cough* *cough* Mustang *cough* *cough*

ba5141e6f3292c969fbfb94064983588.jpg


(I'm not calling it ugly, mind you.)


Actually, there are some very intriguing elements of the Focus' styling that intrigued me back then as well, such as the asymmetrical hood scoop and the "pixie dust" taillights.
 
The keyword is "some".
Yeah, I know, it just tickled me.
Especially with the more modern models that outrun actual sports cars on various road courses.
That's largely a product of evolution. Early Mustangs, such as the one that came immediately after the mid-engined, V4 concept were based on the Falcon. There was nothing sporting about it*, aside from the fact that it had a convertible option like numerous sporting cars. Similar can be said for the first Corvettes, as they were based on large passenger cars--though, the inline 6 in it was set back almost entirely behind the front axle centerline like select few true sports cars of the period (and even since).

*
 
That's largely a product of evolution. There was nothing sporting about it*, aside from the fact that it had a convertible option like numerous sporting cars.
Honestly, I thought the styling was sporty looking to be honest, not just because of the convertible option, but yeah I guess there wasn't much performance oriented about it when it first came out. I was thinking more about the Shelby GT350 and the Boss 302; the 2 track-focused Mustangs from that era.
 
I was thinking more about the Shelby GT350
The GT-350 began as a white Mustang 2+2 fastback delivered to Shelby-American's small Venice, California, shop with Ford's "Hi-Performance" 289 V-8 and four-speed manual gearbox options. Shelby applied a "High-Riser" manifold, big four-barrel carb, hot cam, and free-flow exhaust headers, plus trailing arms to locate a rear axle borrowed from Ford's big Galaxie to replace the stock, light-duty Falcon assembly. This brought bigger drum brakes in the rear that Shelby fitted with metallic linings, while Kelsey-Hayes disc brakes were used in front.

Also installed were Koni adjustable shocks, quick-ratio steering box, front anti-sway bar, a stout steel-tube underhood brace, and 15-inch cast-aluminum wheels with high-performance Goodyear tires. Finally, the front suspension's forward mounts were relocated for optimum geometry. The result of all this was near-neutral handling instead of the standard Mustang's strong understeer -- plus ferocious performance with 306 rated horsepower, versus the factory's 271.

Outside, the Mustang's prancing pony was relocated on the grille, the stock steel hood was replaced by a fiberglass replica with functional scoop, and broad blue racing stripes were applied to rocker panels and atop hood, roof, and trunklid. Inside were racing seatbelts, wood-rim steering wheel, full instrumentation -- and no back seat, in order to qualify the GT-350 as a "sports car" under SCCA rules.

HowStuffWorks
I think the Focus might actually be closer to the Focus concept. :P
 
I think the Focus might actually be closer to the Focus concept. :P
I guess it is when you put it that way.

Hmmm, interesting; I didn't know that the GT350's hood was made of fiberglass and wow; I didn't know Koni was that old of a company. I thought they started in the 1990s for some reason. Well, that's what happens when you're too lazy to research. :lol:
 
:lol:

If I'm not mistaken, KONI came about in the mid-19th century. Anyway, we're getting way off track.
 
Everything but the taillights, I like.

"Bogan" just seems uncalled for.

Ever spent much time in regional Australia? If so, you will know what I mean



Now compare the E Series 3 to a time when HSV actually exercised a bit of design restraint instead of just adding more scoops...

 
Seen it on the streets a couple of times, thought it made a good candidate for this thread:

Maserati Ghibli:

Maser-Ghibli-Review-0.jpg


Frontend ripped off from BMW, placed way too low compared to the long sausage like body style, and combined with the backend of a Lexus:

zam57rta8e1083846-5.jpg
 
Whaaat. I always felt the Ghibli looked great. Only Maserati I didn't like the looks of was the Gran Turismo.
No mate, it's just a case of Chinese style imitation i'm afraid:

2015-bmw-4-series-gran-coupe-7.jpg


+

Lexus_IS250_2008_Tungsten_aft.jpg


= Ghibli :dopey:
Maserati should be ashamed, especially being Italian.
 
Seen it on the streets a couple of times, thought it made a good candidate for this thread:

Maserati Ghibli:

Maser-Ghibli-Review-0.jpg
What? The Ghibli looks magnificent. It's quite easily the best looking car in its class.
No mate, it's just a case of Chinese style imitation i'm afraid:

2015-bmw-4-series-gran-coupe-7.jpg


+

Lexus_IS250_2008_Tungsten_aft.jpg


= Ghibli :dopey:
Maserati should be ashamed, especially being Italian.
So, they're all 4-door saloons, of course they look bit like each other. I admit that the front bumper in it and in the BMW may be slightly similar, but that's about it. And the back looks nothing like the Lexus.
 
What? The Ghibli looks magnificent. It's quite easily the best looking car in its class.
So, they're all 4-door saloons, of course they look bit like each other. I admit that the front bumper in it and in the BMW may be slightly similar, but that's about it. And the back looks nothing like the Lexus.
It's an ugly disproportionate copycat car and you know it!
 
It's an ugly disproportionate copycat car and you know it!
Opinions are opinions. There's nothing wrong with not liking it, but saying that they've just copied design from a BMW that was released a year after the Ghibli, and a Lexus that looks nothing like it in any other way but the colour, is hardly correct. The only car they could have really copied when making it is the Quatroporte, and the two have short time gap between their release, so it's not unlikely that they copied each other when the cars were on the drawing board.

Not to mention the fact, being similar is hardly ever a good reason to call anything ugly. It's like calling the younger sibling ugly because she/he looks too much like her/his older siblings.
 
Opinions are opinions. There's nothing wrong with not liking it, but saying that they've just copied design from a BMW that was released a year after the Ghibli, and a Lexus that looks nothing like it in any other way but the colour, is hardly correct. The only car they could have really copied when making it is the Quatroporte, and the two have short time gap between their release, so it's not unlikely that they copied each other when the cars were on the drawing board.

Not to mention the fact, being similar is hardly ever a good reason to call anything ugly. It's like calling the younger sibling ugly because she/he looks too much like her/his older siblings.
It's an ugly disproportionate car and you know it!

Corrected it :P
I never saw it before so i thought it was brand new.
 
It's an ugly disproportionate car and you know it!
No, I really don't. I know you think it's an ugly disproportionate car, but that doesn't make it a generally known fact to which some people just happen say they don't agree to piss off other people on the internet.
 
Last edited:
No, I really don't. I know you think it's an ugly disproportionate car, but that doesn't make it a generally known fact that some people just happen say they don't agree to piss off other people on the internet.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, so facts do not matter regarding this subject anyhow. I don't really understand that last sentence to be honest but lets not ramble on here and just agree to disagree.
 
Come on! The PT Spyder is a beautiful car.
The front is not too bad, but the area of the windshield and those rear fenders, I don't like it too much. Then again, if you think that beautiful, that's like, your opinion. Honest.

Now, I found one a few or some can agree.

motoring-graphics-2_842318a.jpg


The R-Class. Those headlights, don't really go well...and how it looks on the backside of the car is....eehh. Certainly not one of the decent looking mercedes out there.
 
The front is not too bad, but the area of the windshield and those rear fenders, I don't like it too much. Then again, if you think that beautiful, that's like, your opinion. Honest.

Now, I found one a few or some can agree.

motoring-graphics-2_842318a.jpg


The R-Class. Those headlights, don't really go well...and how it looks on the backside of the car is....eehh. Certainly not one of the decent looking mercedes out there.

My eyes. :ill:
 
Back