That's the typical Italian attitude right there. Since our country is basically ruled by mafia and lobbies we think (or probably hope) every other country in Europe except Greece Portugal and Spain works perfectly.
Nope. Of course, no country is perfect, and every legal system will do blunders. But despite our long history with domestic terrorism it seems that we are the ones having more problems dealing with Islamist terrorism. We started the so-called War on Terror by straight-out inventing terrorist cells to dismantle just to impress the Americans and convicting several persons who had nothing to do with Jihadi terrorism, and then after that we let several high-profile Jihadi recruiters go away scot-free.
And besides, our courts are some of the worst in Europe - a reality substantiated by several studies on the matter, and that jingoistic patriotism won't change.
So your point is let's not do anything against radical islam terrorists because one day another Hitler may eventually rise and hunt us down. Typical left winged laughable hypocrisy, based on the "everygreen" Nazism cliche while at the at the same time obviously burying their heads in the sand like ostriches while these terrorists GETS PAID from EU. Brilliant!
If with harsh laws you are scared another Hitler may rise what about simply kicking terrorists out of Europe so we resolve the problem to the roots?
No, my point is that we can't give discretionary powers to those in charge of prosecution of Islamist - we can't treat them as a special class of criminals for which the right to a fair prosecution is suspended. Why you got that I was talking about Hitler and not about totalitarian governments in general - an idea that as the existence of ISIS proves is quite actual - is beyond me.
Also, where do you suggest we send those terrorists? "Back from where they came from" is not a valid answer when many European Jihadists are European citizens, either of foreign origin or converts. Where are we going to send those people? To Syria, so they can bolster the ISIS ranks?
Finally, it seems that you think it's possible to strike preemptively - how do you plan to do that? Oh, let me guess - by treating all Muslims as possible terrorists?
Ah, no I know, without them you wil not have many people voting left, that's the real problem, that's why they are allowed to stay here and that's why left wing keep vomit their hypocrisy on human rights, while the terrorists voting them are.. surprise surprise, radically against these human rights.
How can you think that a)Jihadists are all European citizens - while also arguing that they are not; b)they vote and c)they vote the democratic left is beyond me. It's a nice story you are dreaming up, but even if all Muslims in any European country were citizens and all voted left they wouldn't be enough to make an even faint difference. So, I am quite sure they are not a concern of the parlamentary left wing which you automatically thought I support. And by the way, here's a protip: I don't. However, in my branch of study I simply can't afford a worldview as simplicistic as yours. I have to consider every possible consequence of the changes you seek - although I have to admit I quite don't understand what, exactly, you'd want legislators to do.
(It should also be worth mentioning that I advocate strong solutions against Islamist terrorism. However, we should never lose sight of the complexity of the world we live in, and of the consequences of our actions)
