Top Speed in a car

  • Thread starter millcreek
  • 192 comments
  • 5,707 views
Not even the point I was making with the aerodynamics... Power transfer is definately a major part in getting these cars running. In a straight line, sure you'll take that CLk, but in turns, you haven't a chance, that is why I suggested the Saleen. American car, can turn and compete with the CLK, possibly bury the thing. Don't get me wrong, I am all about American Muscle cars, but it is time for the next evolutiuon for them. We got the aerodynamics working on the later generation cars, we just need some Old School power put back into them :)
 
Originally posted by miata13B
well, my personnal fastest speeds, hmm
well,
#2 The Miata - fastest I got that thing was up to 169 mph,
169Mph in a Miata ?... Does CERTAINLY not compute.... That's almost as fast as my bike.. In a Miata ?.. That is NOT happening..
 
Originally posted by advanR
208mph - my buddy gave me a ride in his clk-gtr

crazy car
Hmm.. Wonders again.. No site claims that the CLK-GTR can do 200Mph.. Was that indicated Mph on the speedo ?
 
Originally posted by PunkRock
132 mph in a controlled environment

I was going 133 on the Dan Ryan Expressway.

The cops were really stunned at how fast I got up to as they pulled the bodies out of the Volkswagen I hit.
 
Well a Muscle car can beat a CLK GTR with the right Conditions. If a Hemi Challenger was racing a CLK GTR who would win?.............if there where lots of 10 inch high speedbumps, dips and potholes :mischievous: :lol:...
 
Originally posted by Masterblaster
Speed is relative...

MB, no offense or anything but sometimes your posting for no reason. I dont see how your post is "Realitive" to his at all. As I said, No offense so dont take it the wrong way ;)...
 
hang on guys. this is the clk gtr we're talking about, it has about as much in common with a regular car as a bottle of vinegar. muscle cars are fantastic and i love them to bits, but the gtr isn't exactly short itself. what is it, a 6.0 merc engine? very highly tuned... the saleen competing with it? yeah sure, mclaren f1 too, but most other things can forget about it.

Top Speed 191.0 mph / 307.4 kph
0 - 30 mph 1.7 seconds
0 - 60 mph 3.4 seconds
0 - 100 mph 5.7 seconds
0 - ¼ mile 9.4 seconds

Power 447.4 Kw / 600.0 bhp @ 7000 rpm
Torque 699.6 Nm / 516.0 ft lbs @ 3700 rpm

0-100 5.7 seconds!!!!!! :P

feel free to prove me wrong but that car isn't short of anything. err except the aerodynamics, wasn't it pulled out of gt racing because it had a tendency to flip at high speeds? :P

paul
 
Originally posted by Frustrated Palm
MB, no offense or anything but sometimes your posting for no reason. I dont see how your post is "Realitive" to his at all. As I said, No offense so dont take it the wrong way ;)...
Didn't think ya'd get my drift.. no pun intended
 
Originally posted by Masterblaster
Didn't think ya'd get my drift.. no pun intended

I dont see a PUN man :lol:


Back on topic. There is this hill near my grandmother's house. Its on a long streatch of road. It suddenly drops (almost) and you get that weird feeling in your stomach when you go over it fast enough (that kind of hill). Once my dad hit 90 (1992 Mitsubishi 3000GT VR4) and we had lift off (not to high). Lots of people love to jump it and you can see all the tire marks that line the ground where most of them land. My dad and Uncle have the farthest so far :P...
 
hey nightmare all those numbers are correct exept the torque and the hp.

power: 456.4 kw /612.0 bhp @ 6800 rpm
torque:775 nm/ 571.6 ft lbs @ 5200 rpm

(those number are from the 1998 clk gt-r) according to supercars.net)

and the faster clk (on top speed) is the clk gt-r 2002 : 198.8 mph,but 0 -60 is .4 seconds slower = 3.8 seconds.
1/4 mile:n/a
0-100 : n/a

sorry if you're talking about other clk gtr (let me know)
 
Originally posted by Flerbizky
169Mph in a Miata ?... Does CERTAINLY not compute.... That's almost as fast as my bike.. In a Miata ?.. That is NOT happening..
Yeah ummm, well, you know what a 13b is ???? it is a rotorary engine taken out of a RX-7 second generation. Now with a little work and a Dyno slip to prove over 350hp and a car that is less weight then an RX-7. The 13B is less weight then the 1.6 liter inline four engine, which dropped the weight of the car which began at 2295lbs, Also with the dry sump oil system in the car it dropped the engine 2 inches down lowering the center of gravity of the car. Never got a weight difference after that, but the car felt a little lighter. Which I also have the Radar print out of the Car doing that speed too. You tell me now, does that sound about right?
 
Well, Miata13B, I believe the possibility of the speed, but how did you know if the Miata's speedometer only goes up to 140? Just a question...

And MIH, a 626 Wagon/Capella? Cool. Though that's only like 112 mph or so. Still good. Man if I had access to the Autobahn, I'd be running tests for Car and Driver. I don't weigh much more than 95Lbs, so the cars would go faster. Yup. :)
 
Originally posted by miata13B
Which I also have the Radar print out of the Car doing that speed too.
A few of my friends are OPD and They helped me out one night with their radar guns and printed out a form that normally would go to Court versus a speeder.
 
How's this for you guys, right around 260-270 (it's kinda hard to tell , when you CAN'T SEE or MOVE!) strapped down in the passenger seat with KENT SHOCKLEY in his TRIPLE JET ENGINE Mack truck!! at Plattsburgh AFB ,in N.Y. at an airshow & open house at the base.
I won a raffle for a ride with him, friggin' SCARY!!!
And HE LET OFF the afterburners EARLY!!
 
Oh yea, BTW that's in MPH!! also BTW it's the WORLDS FASTEST JET TRUCK, I can't remamber the top speed, probably due to brain damage from that ride! But trust me, that was FAST ENOUGH for me!!!
 
Pffft. That's a truck, not a car.:P

I've been waaay over 700mph...oh, but that was in a jet.;)
 
Originally posted by f50
hey nightmare all those numbers are correct exept the torque and the hp.

power: 456.4 kw /612.0 bhp @ 6800 rpm
torque:775 nm/ 571.6 ft lbs @ 5200 rpm

(those number are from the 1998 clk gt-r) according to supercars.net)

and the faster clk (on top speed) is the clk gt-r 2002 : 198.8 mph,but 0 -60 is .4 seconds slower = 3.8 seconds.
1/4 mile:n/a
0-100 : n/a

sorry if you're talking about other clk gtr (let me know)

nah i just copied the stats off http://www.fantasycars.com/derek/cars/clkgtr.html its not like i took my gtr down to the dyno and had it tested! hehehe.

paul
 
Originally posted by MazKid


And MIH, a 626 Wagon/Capella? Cool. Though that's only like 112 mph or so. Still good. Man if I had access to the Autobahn, I'd be running tests for Car and Driver. I don't weigh much more than 95Lbs, so the cars would go faster. Yup. :)

Well, it probably could go faster, but i had a skibox on the roof. So as soon as the needle past 190km/h, the box started to slide from side to side. And the car wasn't very stable too above 190.
Also because of the box.
 
Originally posted by made in holland
Well, it probably could go faster, but i had a skibox on the roof. So as soon as the needle past 190km/h, the box started to slide from side to side. And the car wasn't very stable too above 190.
Also because of the box.
take the dang box off for you crash an burn next time
 
Back