BHRxRacer
(Banned)
- 1,214
Scary moment for Van Der Garde. Bad day for Vettel and Rosberg.
Also, it's very amusing how it actually shows that some drivers are masters at certain tracks. Maldonado looked great given his car. As would Hamilton at Hungary, Button at Spa, Webber at Monaco etc.
Also, it's very amusing how it actually shows that some drivers are masters at certain tracks. Maldonado looked great given his car. As would Hamilton at Hungary, Button at Spa, Webber at Monaco etc.
The current rule is as ****** as the previous one. Just make it 10-7-6-....-1. Big difference between points is bad, and narrowing it down is a much better solution than double points at the end.Was looking at the points between Hamilton and Rosberg. If Lewis wins on Sunday and Nico is second it will be:
Lewis 100 - 4 wins, 1 DNF
Rosberg 97 - 1 win, 4 second places
Under the previous points it would be:
Lewis 40 - 4 wins, 1 DNF
Rosberg 42 - 1 win, 4 second places
Under the 1991-2002 points
Lewis 40 - 4 wins, 1 DNF
Rosberg 34 - 1 win, 4 second places
1960-1990s
Lewis 36 - 4 wins, 1 DNF
Rosberg 33 - 1 win, 4 second places
I think the 1991-2002 points reflects 4 wins the best over 1 win and beats the current system relative to the points which was suppose to be about giving the winner more.
Current points is better than the 2003-2009 points system which was awful in my view but not by much.
edit:
For the current points to reflect 1991-2002 it would need to be 25 and 15
Lewis 100
Nico 85
25 for 1st and 16 for 2nd seems a good compromise
Would've been funnier if it was "tame" not "train".