Oh, like archery, shooting, golf...?I just watched the winning performance in the individual dressage... with all due respect, but that looked like one of the most un-Olympic events I could possibly imagine, especially compared to the events where you're putting yourself through sweat, tears and in some cases absolute physical agony (swimming, athletics, rowing, weight-lifting e.t.c).
How did Cavendish do in the end??
Hmm bittersweet for me after what he did...
if you win by merit fair enough
Individual cases may of course have their own circumstances that aren't immediately visible but to use an example that we've all heard of Justin Gatlin comes to mind.This blind glory supporting is extremely irritating, if you win by merit fair enough and I'm all for it but if you pull a stunt like that and everybody loves you just because you increased the medal haul it says a lot about the nation and it's really embarrassing. Even the BBC coverage seemed to have a conveniently short memory.
Hmm, Russian boxer given the gold medal in the heavyweight final, in a match he was outclassed in...
He looked apologetic when the announcement was made.
ftfyneeds a buttload of strength and skill.
To the untrained eye it looked like a blatant 'foul', but the commentators (perhaps a bit biased, but who knows) seemed convinced that it was an accident - although Cavendish appears to look right at the Korean guy seconds before the crash, the Korean guy is also looking down (as both riders were above where they would normally have been on the track) and Cavendish may well have interpreted that (or even seen that) as if the Korean rider was moving back down to lower on the track, and then Cav crashed into him as he moved back to a lower line. I can't tell for sure, but I am glad that riders who fall (like the eventual winner) are able to rejoin and that the number of laps completed is not a factor. A pity for the Korean guy though, as it was a nasty spill, but I think it would be wise to give Cavendish the benefit of the doubt and not jump to conclusion that he deliberately injured a fellow competitor.... apart from anything else, Cav was very lucky not to crash himself and lose any chance of a much sought-after Olympic medal, so why would he risk it with a deliberate crash?To be fair to Cavendish it didn't look intentional (he's looking straight ahead when he makes the move and I guess he thought Park had backed off), he apologised for it, the officials decided it didn't warrant a penalty and ultimately it didn't affect Viviani's gold so I'm not sure how he didn't earn his silver on merit really.
Won't deny he's a bit of an arse though. Although I have to admit it's a wee bit entertaining when he gets ratty with the press
I find even riding the bloody things exhausting, but keeping the fine control over your seating and feet positions to make the animal move like that is nightmarish and needs a boatload of strength and skill.
You could change the way it's judged so that there is no room for interpretation. Make it degrees of difficulty only with a time limit and penalize major faults only. Would completely change the look of the sport but it could be done. Might even make it better as speed and power would be premiumized and difficulty levels would likely rise as well. It would be much less predictable.Surely that rules out the entirety of gymnastics?
Arguably one of the most physically demanding sports in terms of all round strength, stamina, coordination and skill.
Yep. And boxing, diving, figure-skating (for the Winters) and so on.Surely that rules out the entirety of gymnastics?
Arguably one of the most physically demanding sports in terms of all round strength, stamina, coordination and skill.
After seeing another boxer robbed because judges can't judge, I agree.*I don’t think that anything that requires a judge's opinion to score it should be a sport.
That would be a huge backwards step for several martial sports.If it has a score subject to opinion, rather than objective (even if arbitrary, like rugby or American Football) events or a stopwatch, it shouldn't be classed as a sport.
Why is there a need for them to change?That would be a huge backwards step for several martial sports.
You'd then be in a position where sports like boxing would revert back to knockout/submission. That'd be absurd, and a rather daft suggestion.
That would be a huge backwards step for several martial sports.
You'd then be in a position where sports like boxing would revert back to knockout/submission. That'd be absurd, and a rather daft suggestion.
They would need to change if they were to meet your standard for inclusion in the Olympics.Why is there a need for them to change?
As I mentioned, there are several things needing tremendous physical strength, skill and discipline that are not considered to be sports. Why do they need to be sports though? What's wrong with something not being a sport? Does it make the thing less valid somehow?
Please can you explain the difference?These are technically contests, not sports. Sports are a subset of the former.
I didn't say anything about including them in the Olympics or not...They would need to change if they were to meet your standard for inclusion in the Olympics.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...lapses-on-fort-copacabana-beach-a7192176.html
More Rio problems, this time by Mother Nature.