2017 Formula 1 Rolex Australian Grand PrixFormula 1 

I'll reserve judgement to when we're not in a street race

Normally I would too but the problems with these cars were no secret - what happened today was pretty much what numerous figures in the sport had said would happen........so I'm not holding out much hope it'll get any better.

Not to be too flippant about it, but fast cars that can't follow each other....... decisive moves made in the pits........German in a Ferarri winning........I fear I'm being slowly transported back to 2004 :crazy:

(And for anyone who likes the sound of that, please may I buy a pair of those rose-tinted glasses you have, I'm gonna need them. :D)​
 
Tire preservation is still important. It can be argued that tires are what lost Hamilton the race
I suspect he's still driving as if he's got 2016 tyres on. And I have to say that I agree with some of Sky's analysis - I think he's misjudged Bottas. It doesn't help his cause that the Mercedes does not work when following another car. They're so used to making a break for it at the start that they probably don't have any data on it.

Elsewhere, I'm reasonably impressed by Stroll. He made a few mistakes, but he exceeded expectations; that said, it should be noted that expectations weren't particularly high to begin with. He's no Palmer, which is probably about the best that can be said for him right now.
 
I suspect he's still driving as if he's got 2016 tyres on. And I have to say that I agree with some of Sky's analysis - I think he's misjudged Bottas. It doesn't help his cause that the Mercedes does not work when following another car. They're so used to making a break for it at the start that they probably don't have any data on it.

Elsewhere, I'm reasonably impressed by Stroll. He made a few mistakes, but he exceeded expectations; that said, it should be noted that expectations weren't particularly high to begin with. He's no Palmer, which is probably about the best that can be said for him right now.

Can't make any declaration yet, not after just one race. I feel that it was mostly a matter of Lewis... he was simply not in his comfort zone. Didn't hear much of anything from Bottas during the race.

-

It's odd that Kimi is struggling with the tires... as that was his advantage over Vettel in 2016.
 
So the outdated, irrelevant V10 on grooved tires still holds the race lap record by 2.4 sec. Maybe they can add a Mr. Fusion to the cars next year to close that gap. :P

C702As5WkAAL25l.jpg
 
Is that a joke?
No. As synonymous as Fosters is with Australia, it's not sold here, and I don't think it ever has been. The three big labels are Victoria Bitter, Tooheys and XXXX, but they're more commonly associated with sports like rugby league - they're the cheap and nasty mass-produced stuff. James Boag and Cascade are probably the local beers on the same level as Heineken.
 
Let's be honest, if Lewis came out ahead of Vettel...he wouldn't have been able to maintain the lead.
I have my doubts about that. If Hamilton in a superior car with fresher tires couldn't get around Verstappen in an inferior car with older tires, then how could Vettel pass Hamilton under that scenario when it appeared they're about equal in pace?

It had been said repeatedly that this rules package was going to make overtaking a lot harder and that appears to be the case. Clean air, clean air, clean air. Always has been a key component to get results but it may be too large a deciding factor this year. I hope I'm wrong but sometimes tells me otherwise.
 
So the outdated, irrelevant V10 on grooved tires still holds the race lap record by 2.4 sec. Maybe they can add a Mr. Fusion to the cars next year to close that gap. :P

C702As5WkAAL25l.jpg

Unless they allow in-race refueling again, that was always going to be a long shot.

Lewis' qualifying lap is still the fastest lap ever run at the circuit.

It just wasn't in a race.
 
You missed the point, that during v10 era they still had lighter cars due to refueling.

Lighter cars, unrestricted fuel flow, were able to meet their rev limit due to unrestricted fuel flow. And didn't have to manage 4 engines a season, thus lower power settings on current cars compared to V10. To compare apples to oranges is a fool's errand.
 
Last edited:
Okay, I take it back.

Bottas:

"I was experiencing extreme wear on the Ultra-soft tires. It was better on the Soft."

("Sort of the reverse of Lewis?" asks the reporter... but Lewis experienced bad degradation on both!)

(On why he didn't push Lewis later in the race)
"We are free to race, but it is more difficult when you are within two seconds of the car in front."

So yeah, maybe the Merc isn't the sharpest tool in the shed for overtaking. But it's early times. We won't know if any of the Top Three teams can perform an on-track overtake on their rivals until we get a few more races in.

-

It's also important to note that if Lewis had stayed out four or five laps more, Vettel might not have gotten that overcut. The fact that Max was there and struggling for pace in front of Lewis when he came out of the pits is what gifted Seb the race. Otherwise, the overcut would have been very, very, very close.
 
No. As synonymous as Fosters is with Australia, it's not sold here, and I don't think it ever has been. The three big labels are Victoria Bitter, Tooheys and XXXX, but they're more commonly associated with sports like rugby league - they're the cheap and nasty mass-produced stuff. James Boag and Cascade are probably the local beers on the same level as Heineken.

It's definitely sold here. Nearly every pub has it and it's about $45 for a carton at most bottle shops.
 
Honda and RedBull are the big fails this weekend.
Haas was good for a while.
Palmer Magnussen and Ericsson need to stand up or they'll be gone soon.
Stroll was ok. Giovinazzi did well.
 
Looks like a 2008ish F1 to me, which is not bad to be honest. Corner speed is increased, If I'm not wrong most of the 2007 - 2008's strategies were on two pit stops. Biggest problem of 2017 rules is still fuel limitation imo. Race pace is still not as fast as ten years ago but the cars are (finally) faster. So let's get rid of silly rules. I remember the times when Schumi and Montoya were fighiting each other with a qualifing pace, lap after lap! That was 2002 2003 or something, glorious V10 era.

Anyway congratulation to Seb and Ferrari, solid win.
 
Looks like a 2008ish F1 to me, which is not bad to be honest. Corner speed is increased, If I'm not wrong most of the 2007 - 2008's strategies were on two pit stops. Biggest problem of 2017 rules is still fuel limitation imo. Race pace is still not as fast as ten years ago but the cars are (finally) faster. So let's get rid of silly rules. I remember the times when Schumi and Montoya were fighiting each other with a qualifing pace, lap after lap! That was 2002 2003 or something, glorious V10 era.

Anyway congratulation to Seb and Ferrari, solid win.
I don't see refuelling ever being allowed in F1 again, so I think the fuel limitations aren't going anywhere.
 
Honda and RedBull are the big fails this weekend.
Haas was good for a while.
Palmer Magnussen and Ericsson need to stand up or they'll be gone soon.
Stroll was ok. Giovinazzi did well.

I don't think that McHonda or RBR really failed this weekend.

Sure, it's sad that RBR couldn't get Ricciardo's car properly fixed, but Max showed very good pace despite them saying they're far behind Mercedes and Ferrari.
And Vandoorne finished the race and Alonso's engine did not blow and was in the points for the majority of the race. Considering the disasterous testing Honda had to endure, I feel like that was one of the best possible scenarios that could've happened.

And yes, I agree, Giovinazzi did really well.
 
And Vandoorne finished the race and Alonso's engine did not blow and was in the points for the majority of the race
Alonso's retirement seems to have been the result of the contact with Ocon.

As for Vandoorne, driving without telemetry was a huge disadvantage.
 
Strange race, still too early to tell where every one is at. The one thing I took from the race and the most disappointing thing is that it does look as though overtaking is going to be even harder this year.
 
With Giovinazzi's performance, I'd be reluctant to put Wehrlein back in the car should I be Sauber's teamleader...
 
Eva
I don't see refuelling ever being allowed in F1 again, so I think the fuel limitations aren't going anywhere.
That's the problem, fuel limitations with wide tyres leads to one pit stop strategies and "boring" races. Wide tyres are great for mechanical grip but we now need to get rid of fuel limitation to allow competitive strategies with faster pace and more pitstops. That's what 2007 - 2008 was all about.
 
That's the problem, fuel limitations with wide tyres leads to one pit stop strategies and "boring" races. Wide tyres are great for mechanical grip but we now need to get rid of fuel limitation to allow competitive strategies with faster pace and more pitstops. That's what 2007 - 2008 was all about.
It's called racing not pitstop challenge.
 
Wide tyres are great for mechanical grip but we now need to get rid of fuel limitation to allow competitive strategies with faster pace and more pitstops. That's what 2007 - 2008 was all about.
I'd really rather not go back to that era. Overtaking on track was extinct. I mean it wasn't too good today either but at least they have DRS now to help.
 
It's called racing not pitstop challenge.
2007 and 2008 have been some of the best years of the sport in terms of "balance of performance" and it wasn't a fake DRS show like it have been in the last years. 10 years ago cars and drivers were pushing to the limit all the time. That pretty much sound like "racing". Now they are forced to go 5 seconds slower of qualifying times...
 
Mixing up strategy by allowing refuelling is not a 'pitstop challenge'. There has to be a balance. It could be argued that needing an over 2 second a lap advantage to pass is not racing either.
Mixing up is NOT racing - never has been never will be. The problem with overtaking - that is downforce for you.
 
Back