- 15,532
- Cairo, Egypt
- GTP_SEMS
What happened with Kimi though? he was terrible.
I'll reserve judgement to when we're not in a street race
I suspect he's still driving as if he's got 2016 tyres on. And I have to say that I agree with some of Sky's analysis - I think he's misjudged Bottas. It doesn't help his cause that the Mercedes does not work when following another car. They're so used to making a break for it at the start that they probably don't have any data on it.Tire preservation is still important. It can be argued that tires are what lost Hamilton the race
I suspect he's still driving as if he's got 2016 tyres on. And I have to say that I agree with some of Sky's analysis - I think he's misjudged Bottas. It doesn't help his cause that the Mercedes does not work when following another car. They're so used to making a break for it at the start that they probably don't have any data on it.
Elsewhere, I'm reasonably impressed by Stroll. He made a few mistakes, but he exceeded expectations; that said, it should be noted that expectations weren't particularly high to begin with. He's no Palmer, which is probably about the best that can be said for him right now.
No. As synonymous as Fosters is with Australia, it's not sold here, and I don't think it ever has been. The three big labels are Victoria Bitter, Tooheys and XXXX, but they're more commonly associated with sports like rugby league - they're the cheap and nasty mass-produced stuff. James Boag and Cascade are probably the local beers on the same level as Heineken.Is that a joke?
I have my doubts about that. If Hamilton in a superior car with fresher tires couldn't get around Verstappen in an inferior car with older tires, then how could Vettel pass Hamilton under that scenario when it appeared they're about equal in pace?Let's be honest, if Lewis came out ahead of Vettel...he wouldn't have been able to maintain the lead.
So the outdated, irrelevant V10 on grooved tires still holds the race lap record by 2.4 sec. Maybe they can add a Mr. Fusion to the cars next year to close that gap.
So the outdated, irrelevant V10 on grooved tires still holds the race lap record by 2.4 sec. Maybe they can add a Mr. Fusion to the cars next year to close that gap.
You missed the point, that during v10 era they still had lighter cars due to refueling.
No. As synonymous as Fosters is with Australia, it's not sold here, and I don't think it ever has been. The three big labels are Victoria Bitter, Tooheys and XXXX, but they're more commonly associated with sports like rugby league - they're the cheap and nasty mass-produced stuff. James Boag and Cascade are probably the local beers on the same level as Heineken.
I don't see refuelling ever being allowed in F1 again, so I think the fuel limitations aren't going anywhere.Looks like a 2008ish F1 to me, which is not bad to be honest. Corner speed is increased, If I'm not wrong most of the 2007 - 2008's strategies were on two pit stops. Biggest problem of 2017 rules is still fuel limitation imo. Race pace is still not as fast as ten years ago but the cars are (finally) faster. So let's get rid of silly rules. I remember the times when Schumi and Montoya were fighiting each other with a qualifing pace, lap after lap! That was 2002 2003 or something, glorious V10 era.
Anyway congratulation to Seb and Ferrari, solid win.
Honda and RedBull are the big fails this weekend.
Haas was good for a while.
Palmer Magnussen and Ericsson need to stand up or they'll be gone soon.
Stroll was ok. Giovinazzi did well.
Alonso's retirement seems to have been the result of the contact with Ocon.And Vandoorne finished the race and Alonso's engine did not blow and was in the points for the majority of the race
Do not bank on Kaltenborn to make any wise decisions ever.With Giovinazzi's performance, I'd be reluctant to put Wehrlein back in the car should I be Sauber's teamleader...
That's the problem, fuel limitations with wide tyres leads to one pit stop strategies and "boring" races. Wide tyres are great for mechanical grip but we now need to get rid of fuel limitation to allow competitive strategies with faster pace and more pitstops. That's what 2007 - 2008 was all about.I don't see refuelling ever being allowed in F1 again, so I think the fuel limitations aren't going anywhere.
It's called racing not pitstop challenge.That's the problem, fuel limitations with wide tyres leads to one pit stop strategies and "boring" races. Wide tyres are great for mechanical grip but we now need to get rid of fuel limitation to allow competitive strategies with faster pace and more pitstops. That's what 2007 - 2008 was all about.
Mixing up strategy by allowing refuelling is not a 'pitstop challenge'. There has to be a balance. It could be argued that needing an over 2 second a lap advantage to pass is not racing either.It's called racing not pitstop challenge.
I'd really rather not go back to that era. Overtaking on track was extinct. I mean it wasn't too good today either but at least they have DRS now to help.Wide tyres are great for mechanical grip but we now need to get rid of fuel limitation to allow competitive strategies with faster pace and more pitstops. That's what 2007 - 2008 was all about.
2007 and 2008 have been some of the best years of the sport in terms of "balance of performance" and it wasn't a fake DRS show like it have been in the last years. 10 years ago cars and drivers were pushing to the limit all the time. That pretty much sound like "racing". Now they are forced to go 5 seconds slower of qualifying times...It's called racing not pitstop challenge.
Mixing up is NOT racing - never has been never will be. The problem with overtaking - that is downforce for you.Mixing up strategy by allowing refuelling is not a 'pitstop challenge'. There has to be a balance. It could be argued that needing an over 2 second a lap advantage to pass is not racing either.
I'd really rather not go back to that era. Overtaking on track was extinct. I mean it wasn't too good today either but at least they have DRS now to help.