2017 General WEC/ELMS/AsLMS Discussion ThreadSports Cars 

  • Thread starter IforceV8
  • 2,611 comments
  • 107,574 views
Because they're garbage now days and don't excite me at all, an Aston/Corvette/Audi makes me dream of driving it, an engine that sounds like nothing else in the world. Meanwhile some of these modern turbos sound like glorified hatches or worse. Its a trend with modern cars, they may look amazing, but the engines in some of them are trash. Don't want the dream car to sound like a fart can. If they were like Impreza's, Quattro's or Henessey Venom's, that'd be great. But they're not.

I don't care if the new 488 is faster than the 458, the 458 sounded like a racer, a monster. Turbos don't excite me, they lack the character of NA's.

While I do agree that many modern turbo engines lack the visceral character of their NA counterparts, to call them garbage does them a disservice IMO. Some of them are marvels of engineering that are actually quite fascinating.
 
CmDyQzJWgAArWuG.jpg



 
Funny thing is, it doesn't sound vastly different from the current NA Flat-6.
 
Last edited:
Air ducts on roof = new engine location? :lol:

Is the engine in the driver seat now?

What? The duct is the same situation as that on DP car or Proto, the placement could be due to intercooler position or radiator. Just cause it sits more above the driver doesn't mean that it goes directly to that area, if we saw inside the car I'm guessing it'd have a vent sending air to where it needs to be. Just within the car rather than outside like most race cars. And probably to keep in line with the actual road car it's suppose to be based on.

And while we're on the subject of how GTE is slowly getting turned into what GT1/GTS was back in the day... Why not just quit beating around the bush and just go full ham with closely mandate rules so it doesn't get out of control budget wise.
 
What? The duct is the same situation as that on DP car or Proto, the placement could be due to intercooler position or radiator. Just cause it sits more above the driver doesn't mean that it goes directly to that area, if we saw inside the car I'm guessing it'd have a vent sending air to where it needs to be. Just within the car rather than outside like most race cars. And probably to keep in line with the actual road car it's suppose to be based on.

And while we're on the subject of how GTE is slowly getting turned into what GT1/GTS was back in the day... Why not just quit beating around the bush and just go full ham with closely mandate rules so it doesn't get out of control budget wise.
I'm guessing it is for an intercooler if Porsche were definitely testing a turbo and a non-turbo variant. #1 seems to be the turbo car if that is the case. I doubt it has anything to do with a new engine placement, which is why I found it laughable that Dagys would speculate on that.
 
I'm guessing it is for an intercooler if Porsche were definitely testing a turbo and a non-turbo variant. #1 seems to be the turbo car if that is the case. I doubt it has anything to do with a new engine placement, which is why I found it laughable that Dagys would speculate on that.

Well it's not his fault, Porsche were the ones to originally bring up the talk about a mid engine 911 for GT racing. At the same time I could see it being used for a rear engine like you said, just the same.
 
No doubt, it was, much like the other GT1 cars of the era, an LMP thinly disguised as a normal car. What I meant by that is that they're both mid-engined turbo "911s".
I wish it was a 911 gt1. That'd be nice to see. I think gte should be close to those gt1's or in between what we have now and previous gen (non-dtm) super gt gt500's.
 
Yeah when I heard it pass in the videos there was a bit a waste gate and spool from the turbo, or at least I can hear it. But perhaps that's cause of F1 for the past few years.
 
Last edited:

Latest Posts

Back