Formula 1 Grand Prix du Canada 2017Formula 1

[LMSCorvetteGT2]

Because a, it's showbusiness and thats how things tend to get done, and b, we've already been told it's definitely not a replica, and where there is one lie its not unreasonable to expect another.

So basically you don't know...and you're just going to see what sticks, cool.

And even if its not the case noone likes to be mislead either. Semantics really.

Most reasonable people I know, as myself included, tend to easily forgive when a mistake is made. So far that's the story, until otherwise proven, that's all I care about, if it happens to be a lie, then I'll happily agree it was in poor taste.

 

[Dhalism]

So basically you don't know...and you're just going to see what sticks, cool.

I also elaborated that even if there was no malice, people still dont like to be mislead. Youre the one whos looking for guilty parties

 

[LMSCorvetteGT2]

I also elaborated that even if there was no malice, people still dont like to be mislead. Youre the one whos looking for guilty parties

Yeah I edited, in respect to the fact you doubled posted. How am I looking for guilty parties? You're the one that posted a conspiracy for viewer rating, and then further argued on flimsy circumstantial evidence of a general idea, not even F1 related. Now you claim I'm the one trying to find guilt? Might want to review that again, I'm the one saying no one is at fault it's an accident. Perhaps look up the definition.

 

[Northstar]

I always love the F1 threads here because there's always some argument going on even if there's really nothing to argue about.

 

[Dhalism]

Yeah I edited, in respect to the fact you doubled posted. How am I looking for guilty parties? You're the one that posted a conspiracy for viewer rating, and then further argued on flimsy circumstantial evidence of a general idea, not even F1 related. Now you claim I'm the one trying to find guilt? Might want to review that again, I'm the one saying no one is at fault it's an accident. Perhaps look up the definition.

I never made those claims. This is the second time i try to talk to u that u try to put things in my mouth.

 

[LMSCorvetteGT2]

I never made those claims. This is the second time i try to talk to u that u try to put things in my mouth.

People dont like being lied to. Having a replica already cheapens that moment, but it's understandable. But why make all that effort to lie about it being race worn? Just say it was a helmet that was owned by Senna, that is good enough.

Because a, it's showbusiness and thats how things tend to get done, and b, we've already been told it's definitely not a replica, and where there is one lie its not unreasonable to expect another.

Bolded what you yourself said, which shows you believe it was done with intent to push a lie on Hamilton and the fans more so. If you can't understand what you're saying I have no idea what to tell you. You yourself here are setting the ground work for a conspiracy.

 

[Famine]

I always love the F1 threads here because there's always some argument going on even if there's really nothing to argue about.

No there isn't, you take that back.

 

[Dhalism]

Bolded what you yourself said, which shows you believe it was done with intent to push a lie on Hamilton and the fans more so. If you can't understand what you're saying I have no idea what to tell you. You yourself here are setting the ground work for a conspiracy.

You need to work on your reading comprehension and logic thats all im gonna say.

 

[UnkaD]

Missed the qualifying. Didn't realize the IRL race might run an hour late when I set the dvr. Hope nothing shifty happens with the race coverage. NBC is already skipping the pre-race.

 

[calvins48]

It's still just a helmet.

I'd disagree with this but each to their own!

 

[MUSC4EVER]

Looking forward to the race, will be channel hopping though as it clashes with the Serbia v Wales Football a bit.

 

[LMSCorvetteGT2]

You need to work on your reading comprehension and logic thats all im gonna say.

So you're saying that you never attempted to push forth the idea that the entire presentation was a lie? And then give further justification as to why you believed such as I've quoted you saying again in my last post. Then you cop out and saying I don't know how to read? How kind of you, explain then what you actually are saying or what I don't understand. Or how I tried to create a guilty party when I said it was no ones fault, and was probably a simple miscommunication.

 

[MUSC4EVER]

Minutes silence impeccably observed 👍

 

[IforceV8]

NBC stream ending to go to TV early.

 

[sems4arsenal]

Ok Canada, entertain me.

 

[LMSCorvetteGT2]

Kvyat having a continuation of his bad weekend.

 

[OutlawQuadrnt]

60/40 chance Vettel beats Hamilton at the start.

 

[Vinylshark]

Bad start from Vettel.
Sainz and Massa already out.

 

[MUSC4EVER]

Great start by Verstappen!

Safety Car!!

 

[sems4arsenal]

Vettel with damage?

 

[LMSCorvetteGT2]

Wow those Red bulls especially Max were given extra turbo boost for the start

Haas car hits Sainz, that takes out Massa

 

[Peter.]

Every commentator initially assumed it was Stroll who crashed.

 

[OutlawQuadrnt]

Whoa! Sainz was flying sideways into the corner!

 

[BrainsBush]

Here we go! Have fun! And what a start of our Max

 

[LMSCorvetteGT2]

Every commentator initially assumed it was Stroll who crashed.

Even if it had been it wouldn't be his fault. Sky reported it correctly when it happened.

Whoa! Sainz was flying sideways into the corner!

He was hit by Grosjean it looked like.

 

[Touring Mars]

Vettel' s front wing is broken?

Edit: tree'd - right of Vettel's front wing looks very floppy

 

[sems4arsenal]

Vettel' s front wing is broken?

Yep.

 

[cjr3559]

First couple laps look like the GTS beta.

 

[jake2013guy]

Vettel' s front wing is broken?

I think I saw a bit from one of the three as well. Might be Vettel.

 

[LMSCorvetteGT2]

Yep.

Have they said why?