Time for another essay.
I don't think you understand the value of having someone in the team with actual racing experience. Someone who is there on hand to direct and oversee gameplay philosophy as well as feedback preliminary racing builds. This would be like hiring Schumacher full time to be a consultant and having a seat at the table throughout GT6's development. I also wouldn't question anyone's ability who was able to accomplish this:
https://www.gtplanet.net/onboard-with-yamauchi-at-the-nurburgring-24h-race/ (2010)
His lap was the second fastest of the team, and two seconds behind that of a seasoned veteran. At one point, Kaz had the fastest lap. He was also instrumental in advising the team on adjustments to the car to improve lap times. And there are other articles on Kaz's other racing accomplishments. You simply can't dispute this man's knowledge and skill as a racer.
It's like you replied to a completely different point. Let me repost it:
I don't know but you could ask the same of PD. The point is, is Kaz's feedback going to be any better than another driver with factually more experience? I don't see how.
and maybe you could rethink what I'm asking there and try again. Because I didn't dispute that he has racing knowledge, I asked why it was being placed in higher stead than a racing driver with factually even more knowledge and experience. Like Gunner Jeannette, for example.