- 4,209
- Wasilla, AK
I guess I just figured the Mini was at the level where a car will be slow no matter how light it is, barring out-and-out track cars like the Caterham. I'm not quite sure where that is, but 75 HP seems like a good cutoff.
There is none because as you said, GM already had a competitor. There was a NASCAR built, but considering those are nothing but purpose-built chassis, it shared nothing in common with the actual production car besides reportedly having the V6 engine. But, a V6 in NASCAR automatically makes it uncool.I don't know, I'd have to find some results sheets from showroom-stock and improved-touring type races in the early- and mid- 1990's. And I'm pretty sure most of those are gone. Rallying & road racing are not mainstream sports here, and GM already had a NASCAR competitor, not that NASCAR is relevant.
So, it was an Olds, then. Guess this is still the closest thing to a Sunbird's racing history.got word on the history of this car from a coworker who was the last owner of this particular car it was the first ever v6 busch car built by don letarte dad of none other than steve letarte . the guy that I work with jerry babb raced the car in 1989 at oxford and beech ridge speedways in maine it was originally an olds and when ole dick petty showd up he had a meltdown cuz he was on the Pontiac deal and a Camaro nose?? was fitted as a close resemblance
Well, you gotta admit, the fact that an 84-87 Honda Civic Si, a car known for being sloooooooooooow despite being an Si and for being the predecessor of the official FnF-wannabe car, not only coming in higher than this but reaching the high side of Meh is pretty ridiculous.
Well, you gotta admit, the fact that an 84-87 Honda Civic Si, a car known for being sloooooooooooow despite being an Si and for being the predecessor of the official FnF-wannabe car, not only coming in higher than this but reaching the high side of Meh is pretty ridiculous.
Well, you gotta admit, the fact that an 84-87 Honda Civic Si, a car known for being sloooooooooooow despite being an Si and for being the predecessor of the official FnF-wannabe car, not only coming in higher than this but reaching the high side of Meh is pretty ridiculous.
The 84-87 Civic is nowhere near cool. And it's not particularly fast either - in USDM form it had only 91 HP. The later Si models could vaguely be described as "fast" but the mid-80s model is pathetic.
Jimmy is sleeping with Becky because OMGZ the SLUTZ!!!
When Toyota designs a car, they aren't so much apathetic towards fun as they are outright hostile towards anything resembling fun. The Camry is the penultimate expression of that design philosophy, hence the things I said about it. I hate it not just for what it does, but for what it is.
And yet, still a more historic racing car than yours.The 84-87 Civic is nowhere near cool. And it's not particularly fast either - in USDM form it had only 91 HP. The later Si models could vaguely be described as "fast" but the mid-80s model is pathetic.
Oh yes, I saw that
I'll admit, for a while I was vaguely considering doing a Bobby Lebonte #18 paint job. Older NASCAR liveries in general are so much better than the stuff they have now.
I still think this car couldv'e been raced in SCCA SSC or SSB competition, but as for finding evidence, good luck. Like I said, no one outside a small circle of participants remembers those races much after they happen.
Its a cheap disposable car, built by a corporation that had a whole business model of making cheap disposable cars.Yes, because a terd of a car with a horrible chassis and terrible factory welds with a gutless engine and weak slushbox is going to hold up so well in a competition. Newsflash...have you seen how these things look on the street within just a few years? I've seen one, ONE car in the last, IDK how many years. The rest have been scrapped.
Its a cheap disposable car, built by a corporation that had a whole business model of making cheap disposable cars.