- 5,068
- Glasgow
- GTP_iainoflo
Oh yes I have done that myself - I do hope the GT5 glitch can be rediscovered or PD can implement interior photography like the glitch in GT5 where you could actually get inside the car.
Shame, then.
is GT6's photo mode better than Forza 5?
- Thread starter bashfulboson
- 727 comments
- 74,039 views
Oh yes I have done that myself - I do hope the GT5 glitch can be rediscovered or PD can implement interior photography like the glitch in GT5 where you could actually get inside the car.
Shame, then.
- 10,956
- Canada
I'll be honest this is what I first thought when I saw this thread, but couldn't help but post on it.This is the thing I'm continually trying to get across, at least from my perspective: they both look like games, neither one of them fools me into believing it's real - photorealism not withstanding.
This is almost so impossibly subjective that it honestly shouldn't even be a discussion, but curious minds and all of that.
I was rather biased I admit, and I'm letting it go now. Both games photomodes are good and unique in there own way, so they shouldn't be compared imo. Although it is funny seeing both parties go crazy over which is better, and thus arguments and bickering begins. 
- 11,264
- Sweden
- eran0004
Based on nothing, yeah.
- 1,033
It's really odd to see that GT6 looks better...Only talking about the cars themselves of course.
bashfulboson
(Banned)
- 77
- New Zealand
This is almost so impossibly subjective that it honestly shouldn't even be a discussion, but curious minds and all of that. [/quote]
now you just try to downgrade GT6 by saying they both look like the game, which is just not true.
By all means, GT does look more realistic when it comes to photomode
[/quote]now you just try to downgrade GT6 by saying they both look like the game, which is just not true.
By all means, GT does look more realistic when it comes to photomode
bashfulboson
(Banned)
- 77
- New Zealand
- 28,470
- Windsor, Ontario, Canada
- Johnnypenso
One can look more realistic than the other while both can still look like a game. They aren't mutually exclusive.
Last edited:
- 14,436
- Los Angeles, CA
- Lma_robot
- lImaRobotl
Tree'd
Yes, it is in fact true. I've also been saying that since the beginning. As realistic as it looks, it's a game, and it very well looks like a game. You can not "downgrade" a game for calling it so.
bashfulboson
(Banned)
- 77
- New Zealand
Details of GT6's model
just incredible
just incredible
- 28,470
- Windsor, Ontario, Canada
- Johnnypenso
No one is denying that it's pretty, but it's not hard to tell that it's from a videogame, especially in those shots.
bashfulboson
(Banned)
- 77
- New Zealand
whatever you say, picture tells
you keep emphasizing that they both look like "game"
it sounds to me that you are trying to equalizing both game to same grade
which is obviously not a fair statement
In fact, most ppl on this thread agree GT6's photo is more realistic than Forza 5
you keep emphasizing that they both look like "game"
it sounds to me that you are trying to equalizing both game to same grade
which is obviously not a fair statement
In fact, most ppl on this thread agree GT6's photo is more realistic than Forza 5
Last edited:
- 14,436
- Los Angeles, CA
- Lma_robot
- lImaRobotl
And that is exactly what it's doing, more so in that batch if pictures over most others in the thread. Although, I do appreciate your vivid imagination.
- 28,470
- Windsor, Ontario, Canada
- Johnnypenso
I don't wonder any more, it's pretty much a foregone conclusion
There's your problem. Read what is written, don't interpret it in a way that suits your own biased view of things.
- 10,956
- Canada
Holy 🤬!! Was that wall of pictures really necessary to get to a point? It shouldn't matter if a game looks real or not, as long as there good to look at, that is fine by me.
- 2,993
- Brisbane
- jimipitbull
- 2,993
- Brisbane
- jimipitbull
- 10,829
- Plymouth, UK
- motorforum
I don't disagree. GT does look very, very good - perhaps more-so in 5 than 6 - yet I don't find the hatchet job being done here on Forza 5 does it any justice, when the pictures initially used were not of a great quality.
It certainly is in Forza. Exposure, contrast, Vignette, position of camera; all of these can help or hinder a scene and what light the photomode captures.
- 14,436
- Los Angeles, CA
- Lma_robot
- lImaRobotl
I'm calling them both a game, because they are both a game, and you can see that they are both a game. Funny thing is, I am one of those people that agreed that GT captures some very realistic shots, I was just debating the fact that FM can capture realistic shots as well.
What I find odd is that you call FM fake, but going off that, there have been plenty of pictures that look more realistic then that Lamborghini(If need, check out the post from @Terronium-12.) Its just turning out to be incredibly biased.. although that was known from the start, so I guess it really doesnt mean much.
Well, not quite. You are not exactly in control of the light available, you are just able to manipulate it. That what @gtuned is getting at, I'm thinking.
Last edited:
- 2,993
- Brisbane
- jimipitbull
- 4,771
- New York
- GO6DoRiFUt0
- gtun3d
You're controlling camera exposure in both games, in no shape or form can you actually control the lighting in either. You can adjust the time of day, but you're still not in control of the lighting. You can adjust exposure so that everything's well exposed, but the lighting can still be trash.
I don't know if Forza has it, but in quite a few GT tracks and stages, the lighting is very harsh and bright. Ronda is a very good example of that.
I don't know if Forza has it, but in quite a few GT tracks and stages, the lighting is very harsh and bright. Ronda is a very good example of that.
Similar threads
