- 40,839
We could start with how there is no reason to do it, and work from there.Why not?
We could start with how there is no reason to do it, and work from there.Why not?
It was 2 years before the PS3 did, but am I missing something? Because the PS3 Slim already came out 3 years ago.
The only thing that is stopping them is the ability to make one in my opinion. It is only a matter of time, so it could be soon as this year or next year.We could start with how there is no reason to do it, and work from there.
No, it's not "only a matter of time." You still haven't given a reason why they would go through the effort of redesigning the system a second time even though you are acting like it is a sure thing that they have one in the works already. What exactly brought this up?The only thing that is stopping them is the ability to make one in my opinion. It is only a matter of time, so it could be soon as this year or next year.
They are constantly thinking of ways to make it cheaper to produce, we are already on the 3rd version of the slim and there has been changes cosmetically and internally. It is only matter of time that they make a slimmer PS3 if they can make it off course. A 28nm RSX version of the Slim will most likely come out if they don't decide to make a slimmer version yet.No, it's not "only a matter of time." You still haven't given a reason why they would go through the effort of redesigning the system a second time even though you are acting like it is a sure thing that they have one in the works already. What exactly brought this up?
They are constantly trying to revise hardware, we are on the 3rd version of the current slim already. Sony have averaged about one per year since release of the original PS3 regarding hardware revisions. The whole idea behind it is to be able is to increase profit margains, and be able to be in the position to do a price drop without affecting the bottom line. A complete redesign will make it more attractive for people to buy a new one, whether if you own a PS3 or not. Might be a response to Wii U as well.Exactly. It's not like one person can knock up a hardware revision in a morning and then test it in the evening and jobs done. It takes a lot of time, effort and money. With one redesign/shrink already done, why do it again? To what end?
The final PS2 slim had the PSU back integrated into it. They constantly want to make it smaller and especially with the PS3, it is more important as it is still quite big and they could make it quite a bit smaller and cheaper to produce and sell it at a lower price point. They could always stick to the current design but it might be a waste of raw materials as they could make it smaller, instead of having just empty space.There is quite a difference between slightly changing the current slim internals and completely redesigning the whole thing again. They only did it once for PS1&2, why would they do a second revision of the smaller PS3?
A hardware revision isn't remotely the same thing as a console redesign. By that logic, Sony redesigned the original Playstation 6 times before bringing out the PSOne.They are constantly trying to revise hardware, we are on the 3rd version of the current slim already. Sony have averaged about one per year since release of the original PS3 regarding hardware revisions.
So again, this isn't something you know or can act like "it's only a matter of time" about. This is something you're assuming will happen but are saying is definite anyway while only looking at half of the facts/costs.The final PS2 slim had the PSU back integrated into it. They constantly want to make it smaller and especially with the PS3, it is more important as it is still quite big and they could make it quite a bit smaller and cheaper to produce and sell it at a lower price point. They could always stick to the current design but it might be a waste of raw materials as they could make it smaller, instead of having just empty space.
I think it's in Sony's best interests to see how the Wii-U actually does on the market before they commit huge sums of money to redesigning, rebranding and repositioning the PS3 on the market a second time, with all the risks that doing such entails.I think it is Sony's interests especially with Wii U coming out to freshen things up.
That's absolute genius right there. end the rivalries between the systems and we the consumers benefit greatly from an awesome system.
That is why I used the term hardware revision. Once they get it small enough, they can think about doing a console redesign, half the power consumption of the original slim could be a good reason for doing one.A hardware revision isn't remotely the same thing as a console redesign. By that logic, Sony redesigned the original Playstation 6 times before bringing out the PSOne.
It is the most logical outcome. It is to reduce costs for Sony, if the technology was out quicker, Sony would have done it by now.So again, this isn't something you know or can act like "it's only a matter of time" about. This is something you're assuming will happen but are saying is definite anyway while only looking at half of the facts/costs.
It is money in Sony's pocket making a cheaper PS3 to produce. That is why Sony actively do hardware revisions, even the latest slim had some cosmetic changes which made it look cheaper and some removal of led lights. They will just replace the current PS3 with the newer model, like how the original PS3 did. People like the latest stuff, they might get one for the sake of it, I will get one for power efficiency and coolness (Temperature hopefully will be low).I think it's in Sony's best interests to see how the Wii-U actually does on the market before they commit huge sums of money to redesigning, rebranding and repositioning the PS3 on the market a second time, with all the risks that doing such entails.
You are, still, completely ignoring actual costs with a console redesign and the risks entailed. It's not simply a matter of "less materials = more profit;" especially not when the difference in material costs is so much lower than, say, removing hardware from the system (as they did with the original PS3 over the years).It is money in Sony's pocket making a cheaper PS3 to produce.
That just tells me that internet journalism is pretty terrible these days when they got what basically amounts to a "No comment" from the guy they asked and reported that one was likely coming out anyway.Here is an article that might sway you:
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2012-06-12-new-playstation-3-super-slim-never-say-never-says-sony
That's not remotely what happened when they replaced the PS3 with the Slim.They will just replace the current PS3 with the newer model, like how the original PS3 did.
What a lucky break. Now you don't have to bother explaining where you pulled all of this stuff from yesterday, which was the only thing I wanted you to do in the first place.By the way, CECH-4000 FCC filing has been found out today pointing towards a new PS3, this time it might be a new redesign as it looks like it has different casing than the current slim from a picture. Interesting stuff, will look forward to Gamescom.
The die shrink is usually where the big savings are. There is a reason why Sony try and change all the time the console and do slimmer models when it makes sense. The postives far outweigh the negatives in my opinion and that is why slim models are attractive. They have to do a pretty bad job, to put people off, like the current slim, quite a lot of people did not like it but it still sold and design grew on people. If they make it more attractive than the current slim, then it will sell well.You are, still, completely ignoring actual costs with a console redesign and the risks entailed. It's not simply a matter of "less materials = more profit;" especially not when the difference in material costs is so much lower than, say, removing hardware from the system (as they did with the original PS3 over the years).
He said never say never. It is difficult to answer the questions for a reason, there is something that might be confidential that he has to hide.That just tells me that internet journalism is pretty terrible these days when they got what basically amounts to a "No comment" from the guy they asked and reported that one was likely coming out anyway.
What happened then?That's not remotely what happened when they replaced the PS3 with the Slim.
What a lucky break. Now you don't have to bother explaining where you pulled all of this stuff from yesterday, which was the only thing I wanted you to do in the first place.
Do you have good ways to clean the slim like the inside of it?
You are, still, completely ignoring actual costs with a console redesign and the risks entailed. It's not simply a matter of "less materials = more profit;" especially not when the difference in material costs is so much lower than, say, removing hardware from the system (as they did with the original PS3 over the years).
That just tells me that internet journalism is pretty terrible these days when they got what basically amounts to a "No comment" from the guy they asked and reported that one was likely coming out anyway.
That's not remotely what happened when they replaced the PS3 with the Slim.
What a lucky break. Now you don't have to bother explaining where you pulled all of this stuff from yesterday, which was the only thing I wanted you to do in the first place.
Do you have good ways to clean the slim like the inside of it?
R1600TurboSo I just downloaded the YouTube app and can't get it to work. The first few times I tried I just got a black screen. After I reset the console, now I just get a little spinning thing down in the corner like it's loading and nothing else.
BubbleBelly542That's odd. Worked fine for me. The only problem I have that isn't very big is the videos don't look as good as my phone or laptop and I believe they are only 720p if that, where my TV is 1080p. But maybe that's because they aren't 37".
To my knowledge there are also not comments or description shown anywhere.
It's very cool though.
DaveTheStalkerIt figures, SONY has become experts at doing things half assed.