I think its a necessary evil to stop all the duping. More driving and less cheating is a good thing
That's vastly different from a trade though; trading is giving a good you don't need or want to receive one you would like to have.I dont say u are wrong but u elocating a phylological aspect . The root is that u can give when u have overflow and are hapoy to get back when needed. That is what makes a community. (our social system)
That doesn't actually work with the debate at hand. I'm not arguing that you're not getting anything in return for a gift; I'm saying that the words 'gift' and 'trade' mark different processes and are, thus, not interchangable.Gonna try it different way. What is a firework?? an event where hell lot of cash is beein literally burned. Why to impress people. First fireworks were held by monarchs to impress other monarcs at parties... It gives u a certain status a rank. So not blown for fun. Now there are still fireworks made by the state, still money burned but it is gained with all the food and drinks beein sold....
To use your own examples: Saying 'gifting' is actually 'trading' is like saying 'fireworks' are actually the 'world cup'. There a different things, entirely different, inf act, that have a commen feature somewhere down the line.The woeld cup? Made for soccer fans? No it is a huge cash machine.
Kaz doesnt make GT for us fans but to get a way to buy Ford Gt's
This might better show what i mean.
The PSN EULA only refers to accounts with fake data. If the maina ccount is set up with proper data, there would be no basis to close it on.@ Luminis
And closing the main account would come in cause the owner created the fake ines providing fake information and statements so there would be no sense in only closing the sub account. And banned i didnt mean from GT but from PSN.
They don't need to dedamage you. For example, look at World of Warcraft. You'll have to agree to them closing your account down whenever you do somethign that violates their guidelines. If you do so, you lose every right you had to be dedamaged.Sure they can close if you pay but they need to dedamage you so you have a certain guarantee especially if you got a couple million users.
Law of supply and demand. If there are no >1 million cars to gift, these will be more wanted by other players who couldn't get them befor 1.07 patch. SO when they remove this limit, an avalanche of petitions will flood the Marketplace forum.Why will they rise in value?
You can't trade them.
JaiAE86And for those of us who purchased certain expensive cars, they will rise in value over time.
The Marketplace will go back to how it used to be, it will be more interesting too.
And for those of us who purchased certain expensive cars, they will rise in value over time.
That's vastly different from a trade though; trading is giving a good you don't need or want to receive one you would like to have.
That doesn't actually work with the debate at hand. I'm not arguing that you're not getting anything in return for a gift; I'm saying that the words 'gift' and 'trade' mark different processes and are, thus, not interchangable.
To use your own examples: Saying 'gifting' is actually 'trading' is like saying 'fireworks' are actually the 'world cup'. There a different things, entirely different, inf act, that have a commen feature somewhere down the line.
The PSN EULA only refers to accounts with fake data. If the maina ccount is set up with proper data, there would be no basis to close it on.
They don't need to dedamage you. For example, look at World of Warcraft. You'll have to agree to them closing your account down whenever you do somethign that violates their guidelines. If you do so, you lose every right you had to be dedamaged.
You do realize that neither the X2010 Vettel or Prototype (carbon) have a price tag? ie. I assume they can still be traded...
Paul may have invited you, and your mother might ask you to invite him too; that's it. You can plainly refuse to do so (because you're being selfish and don't like him). Then Paul invited you over and got nothing from it. That's what a gift is. Like the gifting in GT5. You might receive something in return, but if the one you're trading with isn't playing nice, you don't get anything back. Also see: Scammers. Your assumption is based on the fact that people are always kind-hearted enought to obey the implication of a gift, which is very naive.Trading is how we call it now but infact a gift is the essence of a trade. It just got interned so deep in us that we dont conciously await something in return but infact you push the other one to gift something back. Like u get the ball rolling, k ow what i mean? Other example you are a child, give a bday party, mama says you can invite 20 people. Not all your buddy's are in your school class. You make a list then mamma: oh but have to invite Paul, he invited you... That's what i mean.
I hate seeing x2010 online all the time and all these other crap drivers who somehow have gotten so far.
It's laughable to be honest. They are WAY behind the thinking/methods of the exploiters, who have already got heaps and stockpiles of cars. The 1 mil block now mostly just affects people who haven't already duped/cloned the hell out of their garage.
I doubt that that prevented PD from tagging them with an internal value...
Paul may have invited you, and your mother might ask you to invite him too; that's it. You can plainly refuse to do so (because you're being selfish and don't like him). Then Paul invited you over and got nothing from it. That's what a gift is. Like the gifting in GT5. You might receive something in return, but if the one you're trading with isn't playing nice, you don't get anything back. Also see: Scammers. Your assumption is based on the fact that people are always kind-hearted enought to obey the implication of a gift, which is very naive.
A trade, on the other hand: Giving something away only to receive something.
Paul invites you to his birthday party on the condition that you will invite him over and makes you sign a contract that binds you to this particular trade; so now, you will have to invite him over or go to jail for breaking the contract (a silly one, in this case, but, well, for examples sake...).
TL;DR:
Getting something in return for a gift is voluntary.
Getting something in return for a traded good is mandatory.
Two different processes right there.
it's good that they did this, but why we still don't have auction house? I don't understand that. Its so hard for PD to create it?
The PSN EULA only refers to accounts with fake data. If the maina ccount is set up with proper data, there would be no basis to close it on.
They don't need to dedamage you. For example, look at World of Warcraft. You'll have to agree to them closing your account down whenever you do somethign that violates their guidelines. If you do so, you lose every right you had to be dedamaged.