So that perso. Loses it status and is put to side, he failed to come up with the challenge you launched.
You may invite Paul cause You wanna know what gift he brings, after all the Gift Your mom baught for him wasnt that bad.
You may. That's the keyword here. For all we know, Paul might be tghat idiot kid nobody liked. The kid with the poor parents. You aren't bound by anything, it's your decision to do what he intended you to do or not. There are no inherent consequences in not doing so. There
might be, but it's not a clear cut case of 'Don't do this -> receive punishment'.
And keep in mind that we talked about moments where no money was involved.but arbitrary values.
Arbitrary value or not, a gift is a gift and a trade a trade as both are different from each other; whether a gift comes with the implication of getting something in return doesn't matter. A trade
demands it and that's all the difference you'll ever need to distinquish the two.
Plus someome breacking a contract musnt be going to jail or beein in fault, a construction worker agreed to rebuild your bath. He comes first day, then no sign for weeks. First bill comes in you refuse to pay, instead call the work off and got to court. He wins you pay because you called the work off.
Or you might go to court directly when he doesn't show up and sue him for breaching a contract. Simples.
Or he declares bankrupt and you are ****ed, but his company loses it's face.
But it proves the fact that it workes after the give and get principle.
Because exchanging money for a sorvice isn't a gift, it's a trade.
If he did it for free, without the necessity of you paying him a single dime, that would be gifting. Then, he could just stay away from work while you couldn't do anything about it.
Not giving him a reward if he 'gifted' his services to you is uncool and he'd probably be pissed, but that's it. Furthermore, he's not in charge of what he would receive. If you get a gift back, the gifter is free to chose what you'll receive. If it's a trade, both parties have to agree to the terms of the trade, ie. the goods traded. This isn't present in GT5, by the way. That's why it's a 'gift' system, not a 'trade' system.
So giving false info aint that violating the AUP??? It is so they can close Your main account cause You the Owner lied to them and broke AUP. And if they loom very closely to it U kinda hacked their system and used it in fraud and that means server legal actions.
1) You didn't hack their system because you changed no software, so that's out of the window right there.
2) It is a violation of the AUP; the PSN EULA states:
You must create an appropriate Sony Online Network account (either a PSN account or a Qriocity account) to participate in Sony Online Network. All the information you give us during this account registration must be truthful and accurate. We may refuse a request for registration at our discretion.
So, as you can see, an account with untruthful information can be closed; it does, however, not pose any consequences to your primary accounts. More importantly, how is Sony going to track that two accounts with unrelated informations belong to the same person, and not just someone else who's just using that same PS3?
When i meant paied ser ice was like xbox live and Psn, i didnt mean clise it fir you but it gets shut down totally, all users. Xbox must refund the ones with credit in their account, sony doesnt. Didnt meant that there had to be fraud in there. Just closing the service.
Xbox Live EULA:
6.6. Refund Policies. Unless otherwise provided by law or in connection with any particular Service offer, all charges are earned when received and are non-refundable, and the costs of any returns will be at your expense.
At best, it depends on the jurisdiction of your country. What is for sure, though: If you're excluded for cheating, hacking (or in this case, duping), you will get no refund of anything at the expenses of Microsoft.
