Save the Manuals!

I followed trougth race'emhard's sig link and I saw this why save manuals, are they "disapearing"?

But...maybe when I'm old enought (14yrs only) I could get a manual trans car :)
 
If fully manual is fastest why WRC and F1 have clutchless paddleshifting tranies?

I'm between the two extremes and support semi-manual (clutchless paddleshifters).

Although I'm sure in the future mounted cameras will judge conditions further up and make even semi-manual obsolete, in which case with a fully auto the driving will be the same as with a fully manual, maybe with the difference of the fully auto not making mistakes. ;)

Untill that happens I support semi-manual (clutchless paddleshifters). 👍
 
It's just the ego in some of us that detest paddle shifters.

I firmly believe if you want that 600 horses, you have to earn it.

Paddle shifting makes daily commutes somewhat easier though.
 
It's just the ego in some of us that detest paddle shifters.

I firmly believe if you want that 600 horses, you have to earn it.

Paddle shifting makes daily commutes somewhat easier though.

If I ever drive a manual I'd prefer to have paddle shifters.
 
Hey I like my chicken baked, others fried.

At the end of the day we like chicken.
I like this spirit.
If fully manual is fastest why WRC and F1 have clutchless paddleshifting tranies?

I'm between the two extremes and support semi-manual (clutchless paddleshifters).

Although I'm sure in the future mounted cameras will judge conditions further up and make even semi-manual obsolete, in which case with a fully auto the driving will be the same as with a fully manual, maybe with the difference of the fully auto not making mistakes. ;)

Untill that happens I support semi-manual (clutchless paddleshifters). 👍

I'm not trying to say that manuals are faster; on the contrary, they are much slower than semi-automatics using dual clutch systems or paddle shifters. They are, however, faster than torque-converter autos. I maintain that a manual is more fun to drive, and, having now driven both, have experienced this.
 
^A fully manual is more fun but mostly for coutryside or track days. For city traffic it's just an annoyance, at least for me.
 
^A fully manual is more fun but mostly for coutryside or track days. For city traffic it's just an annoyance, at least for me.

Yes, an automatic is far, far easier, but I think the benefits of a stick outweigh the trade-offs. Of course, this is a matter of opinion (hence this thread).
 
They are, however, faster than torque-converter autos. I maintain that a manual is more fun to drive, and, having now driven both, have experienced this.

Not always. A properly tuned torque converter auto will be faster than a manual.

Bone stock though, a manual equipped car will usually be quicker due to the lousy factory settings for the auto.
 
Maybe when shifting, but not when it comes to overall lap times. An auto doesn't know not to shift in a corner and won't hold a gear.
 
Maybe when shifting, but not when it comes to overall lap times. An auto doesn't know not to shift in a corner and won't hold a gear.

Some do these days. Mostly performance oriented car's with auto's though. I'm not defending them since I stick by my 3 pedal'd brethren but a fully built auto can be enjoyable in a way. The auto in my old Police Interceptor was quite a beast, it would just slam them into gear and chirp the tires going into 2nd and somehow that was fun in it's own way.
 
the more I think about it, I don't think I would mind a paddle shifted semi-auto tranny. I love driving my car and am always reminded when I need to drive someone's automatic car but I just want the car to shift when I want it, not when it wants to. I guess when I get older, giving up the third pedal wouldn't be so bad if I could keep control of the shifts.
 
I've been driving stick as long as I've been driving.

I used to do deliveries for an entertainment company in Hollywood. Drove all over LA, 8 hours a day, through some of the worst traffic around. I did it in a manual WRX and didn't have a problem with it.

I traded my '09 Civic Si (manual by default) in on a '12 Mazda2 with a 5spd a few weeks ago, so I guess I technically have bought a manual car since this thread was started. Here's the requisite interior porn:


Mazda 2 Interior by maximstensel, on Flickr
 
Wow, that's a great interior for what's supposed to be an economy car. I think mazda chose a great color for the backlighting, that orange-red color looks good.
 
Wow, that's a great interior for what's supposed to be an economy car. I think mazda chose a great color for the backlighting, that orange-red color looks good.

They did a really nice job with it, at least on the Touring. (Upper trim level, which mine is.) I really like how the seat fabric and piping go really well with the dark silver exterior, too. The whole car feels just like a Mazdaspeed inside.
 
The auto in my old Police Interceptor was quite a beast, it would just slam them into gear and chirp the tires going into 2nd and somehow that was fun in it's own way.

Not a very slushy slushbox then! Presume the P71s had uprated transmissions compared to regular Crown Vics.
 
So, how would you guys convince an automatic transmission to downshift without changing the speed of the car? Is there a way? I ask because yesterday I was driving with the driver's ed instructor in the school car (automatic Fusion), and I felt like the car should have been in a lower gear, but it wasn't. I was doing 25 MPH, and the engine was turning over at 1500 rpm. Efficient, but not very responsive.
 
More throttle = downshift.

Less throttle = upshift.

Quite a few autos allow you to manually select what gear range you want; some have a completely manual 2nd gear (where if you select 2nd, you've GOT 2nd, even if not moving), some only "limit" what gear the trans can be in (but will shift normally up to that point). Oh and some (hai more recent Mazdas) have a manual mode that will actually listen to you aside from not letting you overdownshift. Limiter smash? Sure.
 
I must say, I was wondering why Beeblebrox wanted to save user manuals, until I noticed this thread.

I've only driven manual cars. Automatic gearbox seems so lazy, although I can also see the benefits.
 
More throttle = downshift.

Less throttle = upshift.

Quite a few autos allow you to manually select what gear range you want; some have a completely manual 2nd gear (where if you select 2nd, you've GOT 2nd, even if not moving), some only "limit" what gear the trans can be in (but will shift normally up to that point). Oh and some (hai more recent Mazdas) have a manual mode that will actually listen to you aside from not letting you overdownshift. Limiter smash? Sure.

Ah, I was hoping for a loophole. Interestingly, the Fusion that the school has, despite being fully loaded (SYNC, cruise control, satellite radio, power seats, automatic climate control, etc), does not have a way for the driver to select the gear, other than putting the transmission in low. Maybe that feature is only available on the V-6, I don't know. On a different note, I want a Mazda even more now.
 
I would hate for manual transmission cars to disappear altogether...
weeping.gif
 
MSTER232
I would hate for manual transmission cars to disappear altogether...

The only way to prevent this is to buy a brand new car with a manual trans. I know the new Focus is selling pretty well with the manual and Ford even started putting a 5spd in all trim levels because of the sales. So buying new cars with 5spds does work to help save manuals.
 
So, how would you guys convince an automatic transmission to downshift without changing the speed of the car? Is there a way? I ask because yesterday I was driving with the driver's ed instructor in the school car (automatic Fusion), and I felt like the car should have been in a lower gear, but it wasn't. I was doing 25 MPH, and the engine was turning over at 1500 rpm. Efficient, but not very responsive.

In my 328i stab the throttle for a moment, literally as fast as you can, it'll kick down but the engines not responsive enough to actually speed the car up at all in such a short burst, then it'll normally hold the lower gear until you ease off where the throttle was before. It just feels like a clumsy shift in a manual car.

or, put the gearbox in sport mode and it'll normally sit a ratio lower all the time.

or, manually select 2nd

or, accept that whilst learning to drive, in what I guess must have been a built up area, you don't actually need the car to be more any more responsive than it was. Seriously, what's going to happen in the half second it would take for the car to change gear if you stepped on it?
 
The only way to prevent this is to buy a brand new car with a manual trans. I know the new Focus is selling pretty well with the manual and Ford even started putting a 5spd in all trim levels because of the sales. So buying new cars with 5spds does work to help save manuals.

True, as they will want to make more of the successful transmission. But then again, I'm not old enough to drive yet. But when I am I'm making sure I get a manual transmission :D .
 

Latest Posts

Back