You might be rating Vettel so highly because the Torro Rosso STR3 was really not as bad of a car as most Sebastian Vettel fans had it out to be. Take Monza for example, he only won tat race because of torro rosso's decision to spend the weekend working on a wet setup for the car, and because the forntrunners all got tyre choice wrong, and so started pretty far back, which also meant they were unable to fight Vettel for the win. Bourdais qualified 4th that day, as well. I think that the STR3 slotted itself in with the Renault that year in terms of speed, or slightly slower at times.
Don't get me wrong, he is incredibly talented, but that Torro Rosso isn't the heap of junk people say it is, only to help prove their point of Vettel being the best. It's a similar story to Hamilton in 2009. The car started as a multimillion dollar piece of ballast, but it ended up being one of the best cars on the grid, somewhere between Brawn and Red Bull. Some would make Lewis out to be so great, by saying that he was winning races and taking poles with that "rubbish" car, when even Lewis argued that it was not the same car by the time he was winning races.