You're on the wrong thread.Is this really the way to solve police brutality?
I wonder who is going to protect the citizens after they disband the MPD. From what I have seen Minneapolis is more dangerous than Flint, MI. The place where apparently you can get shot for any reason.
https://www.neighborhoodscout.com/mn/minneapolis/crime
So Floyd's death, police brutality and protests has nothing to do with my post? If my post is off topic please mods delete it.You're on the wrong thread.
LOL, you're even arguing about that.So Floyd's death, police brutality and protests has nothing to do with my post? If my post is off topic please mods delete it.
On the other side your post about UE flag is totally in line with this thread.
I always thought we are discussing police here. Silly me...You're more likely to get a relevant response to your questions about the police on the thread where the police have been discussed.
lol do you think I'm posting for the likes? I don't give a damn about a like.As ever you keep missing the points made by other people in favour of more pointless arguments. No wonder nobody seems to like your posts.
The title says police brutality, not defund the police. Silly you, indeed.I always thought we are discussing police here. Silly me...
That's probably just as well. Plus more stuff I never said. Look, post where you want, but if you're interested in answers rather than argument I'm just pointing out that there's already a thread on which people have addressed the specific issue you bring up in your post.lol do you think I'm posting for the likes? I don't give a damn about a like.
And when did I talk about defunding the police? The disbanding of MPD is clearly the result of protests due to the police brutality. Yeah, silly me.The title says police brutality, not defund the police. Silly you, indeed.
Unbelievable... well, good luck with those replies... hope you get the kind of answers that your post seems to be loaded towards... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯And when did I talk about defunding the police? The disbanding of MPD is clearly the result of protests due to the police brutality. Yeah, silly me.
And when did I talk about defunding the police?
The Big Bit of Strela's PostCity Council members formally announced their commitment to end the MPD and create a new transformative model of public safety.
Yeah, silly me.
Yup.Really?
>27 officers injured
>peaceful protests
It could have been funny but the policewoman who fell off the horse is now in coma.
>27 officers injured
>peaceful protests
It could have been funny but the policewoman who fell off the horse is now in coma.
I wonder who the authorities will blame for the horserider's injury. She appeared to be riding full tilt into a traffic light.
JFK was a popular president with delusional young people like me dreaming of Camelot. But with the military, the CIA, the mafia, and the oilmen he was deeply unpopular. His assassination briefly solved a lot of problems for some.Jacqueline Kennedy enjoys large-peaceful car ride through Dallas with largely-alive husband.
JFK was a popular president with delusional young people like me dreaming of Camelot. But with the military, the CIA, the mafia, and the oilmen he was deeply unpopular. His assassination briefly solved a lot of problems for some.
I'd seen that clip elsewhere on t'webs, hadn't realised it was from yesterday's protests. An awful accident but I'm not sure it can be attributed to the protests any more than an officer crashing their car en route could be.
A boris bike was thrown at the horse. Not attributed to the protests? I'm sure hundreds people screaming and hurling stuff is attribution enough.
I see you and raise you defacing a statue of Lincoln
I know the "slippery slope" argument is overused but then, seriously, where does it end?Oh and yes statues of Churchill should be reconsidered, particularly given his past, that is unless you are going to campaign for statues of Stalin to be re-commissioned (who had more to do with the downfall of the Nazi's in Europe that anyone, yet was a mass-murderer and has been rightly remembered as such).
The slippery slope is a logical fallacy for a reason, thank you for being so kind as to illustrate way.I know the "slippery slope" argument is overused but then, seriously, where does it end?
Bomber Harris?
Patton?
The point was about the statues of Churchill and how they need to be "reconsidered". I'll remove the stuff below it in the original post.The slippery slope is a logical fallacy for a reason, thank you for being so kind as to illustrate way.
Are you seriously advocating that history should be taught in a biased way as to not be honest about both the achievements and failures of historical figures?
Why shouldn't they be reconsidered?The point was about the statues of Churchill and how they need to be "reconsidered". I'll remove the stuff below it in the original post.
Please don't say we shouldn't have statues of Churchill. We can commemorate his undeniable contribution to guiding Britain without glorifying Gallipoli. It's imperative, in my view, that we remember how horrific a time that was, that we really needed a man like that to get things done.Oh and yes statues of Churchill should be reconsidered, particularly given his past, that is unless you are going to campaign for statues of Stalin to be re-commissioned (who had more to do with the downfall of the Nazi's in Europe that anyone, yet was a mass-murderer and has been rightly remembered as such). Your statement that Churchill was "the man who defeated fascism in Europe" is so far from accurate that its an utter re-write of history. It also ignores the contributions by European forces (from Norway, Poland, France, Holland, Belgium, Czechoslavakia and Greece) as well as seeming to forget the Americans, Canadians, Australians, Commonweath (15 million of whom fought in the war), New Zealand and Norwegian forces. That's just at D-Day alone and ignores the country that suffered the most (with a third of all deaths in the war) which was Russia. Churchill was not the man who defeated fascism in Europe, he was part of a massive, worldwide effort that did, and to hold him up as being the architect of it is a re-write of the reality of the war.
Oh and in case anyone forgets: Britain, we're going to war with Germany to ensure Poland remains free / Britain at the end of the war, sorry Poland, you're Russia's now.
History as its taught in the UK is so clearly biased in this regard that we do as a country need to better understand both sides, just go and speak to anyone from Ireland and ask them the reality behind the history of this country in Ireland. You will get a very different and more accurate view of what happened. This is why we have the utterly absurd miasma of British Exceptionalism, which in part is why Brexit and the last general election went the way it did. Its long past the time that the UK grew up and understood its real part in the history of the world, both the good and the bad it has done, as the later is very sorely missing right now.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-29701767
View attachment 928350