I think some people need to go back and read Luminis' opening post. He said nothing of the Miata being the best, most elite, or most desirable car. The bias on both sides is getting away from the original point, which I feel is about the Miata's legacy.
Exactly. The point is: To appear on a list of greatest cars of all time, the car doesn't have to be the fastest, best handling, most beautiful, whatever have you.
There are other things to go by. Influence on both the car industry, car communities, popular culture and so on. For example, the F40. A stunning car to behold, but did it have much influence on the industry? No, quite the opposite. Car communities? No. A car that expensive can rarely do that. Is it the fastest? By todays standards, it for sure isn't. Back then, it was, yes, not anymore, though. Did influence pop culture? Was it desirable? Hell yes, most people will remember the F40 as
the super car of their childhood.
The Miata just ticks other boxes. It influenced the automotive industry so much it isn't even funny. Did it have an impact on car communities? Damn right, it did - it even has its own spec race series.
The one thing that one has to understand here is the following:
There are cars that are legendary because of what the individual car was. Let's be honest, it wouldn't have made any difference whatsoever whether Ferrari build 50 F40s or 5000. The car is legendary for what's sitting their, on all four wheels.
The Miata isn't a legend for what the individual car is. It's because of what all the Miatas did, as a whole, as a collective, so to speak.
It kept the enthusiast's car alive, that's what it did.
If someone can't see the difference between those reasons for being a legend and/or fails to understand that both are valid, well, that's a shame.
Let me put it this way, though:
The Ford Model T surely was no stunning beauty, nor an incredible performer, but is anyone saying it's not a legend? The Miata is basically the same, albeiit on a much smaller scale.