Scaff
Moderator
- 29,742
- He/Him
- ScaffUK
Just for curiosity, where did you work so that you were able to see the process?
Renault/Nissan UK
Just for curiosity, where did you work so that you were able to see the process?
I can't help but think that, if it really were a return on investment issue, that PD would be pumping the DLC packs out, just like everyone else is. They're practically pure profit for a game with such a huge "installed user base"!
I disagreeThis has truth dripping all over it.
Plenty complained about SSRXAbout the track money :
SSRX - 3.99 euros - No one complains
Motegi + Superspeedway - 4.99 - A few complain
O.o
I'm always happy with new content, but what bothers me is that we already had the extra content on our PS3. We only paid to unlock it. Then why on earth it's always taking PD so long to let us unlock it
Plenty complained about SSRX
Seriously ? Sorry but I didn't saw as soo obvious (well .. like this )
How on earth do you know its already on our PS3's?
It almost certainly was not
It was in the last update, so I assume he means we could have unlocked it then.
You know it's there from the last 400mb update.How on earth do you know its already on our PS3's?
It almost certainly was not
I would say the main reason for the addition of the Schwimm-/Kubelwagen by PD was from a historical standpoint. I've always seen the history of cars, or in this case--car development history, to be a priority in GT5 by PD. The inclusion of the museum and museum card collection is strong evidence for this theory. This doesn't validate it but it might explain the WHY(because racecar-- I'm aware of this) question... Their target audience with the Schwimm-/Kubelwagen, was a very "niche" market so it was quite a gamble.
It was in the last update, so I assume he means we could have unlocked it then.
That's exactly what I mean.
You know it's there from the last 400mb update.
I find it quite unlikely that VW paid PD to have them in GT5, if I had to guess they may well have been the 'price' that PD had to pay (in addition to a lot of money) to get Lambo in GT5, either that or Kaz just had a mad moment and asked for them to be included in the licence, but VW gain nothing by having them in GT5. The marketing advantage of having them in would be nothing in comparison to a current model version of any VW product.I think VW paid them alot of money, but I would have prefered cars with historical value. Or historic race cars (I mean GP cars of the 20s and 30s).
It takes them so much time and money to modell a car for this game. I really feel sorry for those who had to model these two cars...
Scaff, what you're saying is one single car just happens to be the same size as 4 race tracks, 200kb??? You know better than that.
Sorry, but this thread blows. Not all, but most of you seem as though you are around the age of 12. Perhaps you want to come sit in my cubicle for the next five hours then go home and mow my lawn....then we'll see if your still whining about DLC.
BeefstallionSorry, but this thread blows. Not all, but most of you seem as though you are around the age of 12. Perhaps you want to come sit in my cubicle for the next five hours then go home and mow my lawn....then we'll see if your still whining about DLC.
BeefstallionSorry, but this thread blows. Not all, but most of you seem as though you are around the age of 12. Perhaps you want to come sit in my cubicle for the next five hours then go home and mow my lawn....then we'll see if your still whining about DLC.
DaveTheStalkerDo you job. Your not getting paid to read posts on GTPlanet Or are you...
thelvynauMaybe he is that would be a job I wouldn't mind.
Do you job. Your not getting paid to read posts on GTPlanet Or are you...
Keep in mind that if it does take six (man) months to produce a premium model in GT5 then by PD time-frames they have been 'pumping' the DLC packs out and with the exception of Spa they have mostly seemed to my mind to be based on the minimum investment requited to get the most return.
...
Although the six-month figure is likely an exaggeration or upper-bound, especially at this late stage in both the hardware and game platforms' lifetimes, that still means that every six months there are around 20-30 cars being produced, minimum - it's a continuous process. That's assuming that half of the production staff are modelers (etc.) and half of those are working on cars. Kaz has been quoted as saying that "60% of the development time" went on cars, so the production rate is likely closer to 50 every six months, possibly more.
And GT Academy didn't take away time from modeling, but it isn't the modelers who prepare the DLC packs for download from the PSN and integration into the game - the FR-S, for instance, has been modeled at least as long as the 86 was, since they appeared in a show demo together.
I guess PD wanted everyone who worked on the logistical, testing etc. side of things to focus on those aspects for the Academy to try to avoid the issues from previous events, and to be sure it went without a hitch at all this time.
There's a chance the DLC will pick up again now, depending on how far away GT6 is (I would guess another year at least, but that's neither here nor there at this point.)
I'd personally like to see a core features and functionality update first.
I think VW paid them alot of money, but I would have prefered cars with historical value. Or historic race cars (I mean GP cars of the 20s and 30s).
It takes them so much time and money to modell a car for this game. I really feel sorry for those who had to model these two cars...