- 10,276
- Sacramento CA
- cnd01
I got one
You monster Anyway, I updated the schedule on Le Mans School. I hope this makes. It already has well over 100 views but only 8 replies.
I got one
cnd01You monster Anyway, I updated the schedule on Le Mans School. I hope this makes. It already has well over 100 views but only 8 replies.
Everybody seems to have their own opinion when it comes to the Leaderboard ... while I'm all for the people tobe heard, I suggest that everyone please express their opinion ... the Members of the Board will then convene, with a representative of the Stewards Council, to decide on the way forward with the Leaderboard ...
Yea we need tier champions is addition to an overall champion. One person may dominate a particular style of racing, but not be good enough in other aspects of motorsports to win the W.M.A. overall championship.
MrMelancholy15To clarify:
-Tiers are different levels of drivers
-Disciplines are groupings of several similar series
-Series will have their own championships
-Disciplines will have their own Leaderboards
-All of the disciplines (incl. drifting) will be scored together on the main Leaderboard.
-At the end of a season, we'll congratulate the cleanest, "favourite" W.M.A. Member.
The "favourite" W.M.A Driver(s) will be chosen by the Stewards, in a process which I'll see finished by myself. Their decision will be based on general/overall good conduct. Those in good standing include (but are not limited to): kk20, Driver101, Sakery, Allykh2882, etc. who are serious, polite, professional and enthusiastic.
So are you saying that a win in a tier 1 series has the same weight as a tier 4 series. Im just not understanding...
Not quite. I'm saying that those who are clean drivers will be rewarded, those who aren't clean will be removed, and those who win a lot in Tier 1 will progress quickly to higher level competitions, if they want.
Tier 1 points/Tier 4 points will still be discussed.
Finally: wish me luck! I'm going to be driving all weekend!
MrMelancholy15Not quite. I'm saying that those who are clean drivers will be rewarded, those who aren't clean will be removed, and those who win a lot in Tier 1 will progress quickly to higher level competitions, if they want.
Tier 1 points/Tier 4 points will still be discussed.
Finally: wish me luck! I'm going to be driving all weekend!
kk20Oh ok...Just would race directors rate everyone based on safety? Its a lot of work. Checking every lap of every driver to see if they abide track limits and if they tap or bump an cars is gonna take ages. If I was a RD I certainly wouldnt do this since it would just take ages....
polarbear345Yep.
kk20Lmao yep?
I am oncourse in making an epic post regarding the leaderboard...brace yourselves...
polarbear345I truly don't want to watch everyone race the whole race.... It doesn't sound fun...:
Hmmmm, the original ideas for Tiers was going to be the 4-1 with 4 being highest "level" of competition, and Tier 1 being the entry level "first step."
Certainly, I don't disapprove of that idea. I think it would/could be an interesting addition. I would even start myself off in Tier 1/4 and work my way up, to show others how it works, and work out the bugs from the inside.
Anyways, let's set up a Tier advancement system, so we know when drivers are ready for "the next step" in the ladder. I'd like to discuss, following Tier discussion, the W.M.A. Points requirements to advance.
I'm thinking that the lowest tier would be 200 points in a single series, or 500 points in a season overall, before advancing into the next tier, which would be a doubled effort, etc. Anyone disagree or agree?
How about you may only join tier 1-2 if you have won 2 races in tier 3-4 or achieved 5 podium finishes
NizmoDr3I will explain in detail, my opinion, the points system, 'Tiers' and advancement through the Tiers soon ...
Any takers on the Engen BMW 135i Cup?
Here's an idea based on the golf world handicap system, every person completes 3 races and gets a handicap based on their finishing positions, basically a grade out of 10, if the field is 16 cars then the last 6 cars are credited as a loss "pending on being incident free race" so say after your first three races your average finish position is 7th, there for you would be also a tier 1 racer so your handicap would be 1.70, the next race comes along your "handicap" being 7 means that your expected finishing position would be 7th, and your handicap position doesn't change, and you should be happy that you raced to your handicap, if you finish 6th then you should celerbrate as your handicap will become 1.65, finish the next race 6th and your handicap will be 1.60, and so on, this would also work if you finish 8th, your handicap would go out from 7 to 7.5, also on a monthly basis we could review your handicap and anyone who is 1.40 can be moved up to a teir 2 handicap at 2.80 and someone in tier 4 who isn't doing so great and there handicap becomes 4.10.0 can be relegated to tier 3, and start in tier 3 as 3.20, your handicap would not affect the series you chose to race in as you would already be committed to that series but could limit or expand your choices on joining a new series, this would be easy to monitor as it would all be pending on the end race results of any race you take part in, and the winner could be seen clear as if they are having regular fantastic results or just doing a decent job as at the start of the month we would record your handicap and check the difference between that and your current handicap and the difference in points will be recorded, using this figure will put you in a ladder system the person with the most points accrued over the desired time length would win, no one would go outside of a 10 handicap in tiers 2-4, tier 1 your max handicap could only be 16 no higher, it requires more ironing out but using this relative easy system we can reward the most improved and most consisted across all tiers,and wouldn't really matter if you raced 15 races a week or 1 race a week, it would just mean the people who race more would get to improve up the ranks faster then others,
TDZdaveI have reworked the idea for the handicap system, instead of it being based on tiers its based on a whole then divided into 3, I think 4 tiers is to many,
Kk, your idea is great but might end up being to complex, I like it though, you really put a lot of effort into it, I respectfully say that, my 1 concern as I have expressed is its really complex
👍 thanks for your input. Which part is too complex? All you do is tick boxes and add up the score.