ROAD_DOGG33J
Premium
- 14,304
- IL, USA
- holyc0w1
- holyc0w
So again,i don't want to see any horrific accidents,and see any one get hurt!!but for real man....(ahhhummmm)where are the men!!!!...đź’ˇ
Ask Henry Surtees
So again,i don't want to see any horrific accidents,and see any one get hurt!!but for real man....(ahhhummmm)where are the men!!!!...đź’ˇ
Mate i really don't want to go in a huge discussion with you here....
The "assumption" you seem to think i made whas all based on the feeling i think some drivers having an edge over others....(read my first post....) some drivers are WC and some are just not...even IF THEY WINN RACES!!!!!!!!!!!!
And about the "men" I SPOKE ABOUT 20-30 YEARS AGO???...they races on tracks without any barriers whatsoever man....without the safety tooles they have now,and bthey went even faster!!!!....
So again,i don't want to see any horrific accidents,and see any one get hurt!!but for real man....(ahhhummmm)where are the men!!!!...đź’ˇ
spy.
Ask Henry Surtees
I haven't been watching nearly as long as you have, but I do know how the considerably classic (and better) races went down but I really can't offer any perspective toward that because, as I've said, I wasn't watching (or even born) during that time. I can only speak of that I know, what I'm trying to get across is just because the rules aren't as lenient (practically non-existent, arguably) doesn't mean the drivers are any less ballsy or thereabouts. It just means they have to work around the implemented safety rules.
Fair play man...
But working around the rules or within them doesn't make anything safer or not.... high speed racing is dangerous,whith any rules....
Nuff'said....
spy.
Look at Rally racing, now tell me, who's more ballsy - the drivers or the spectators? Survey says: Spectators. Just a relative point, hope you see the significance in it.
Now that is as immature as can be a post i have evr read.... but byou won't understand that probably untill you have actually been in a situation where you loose someone close................................
Because your posts calling out the drivers risking their lives have been completely mature. F1 isn't as safe as you make it out to be. The drivers should know what kind of visibility they need to race reasonably safely.
Future Drivers Stewards, perhaps?Blown engine by vettel!!!!
That was odd....oh, Vettel ran back to become a fireman! Yeah, that is odd with the drivers lately, they're super quick with becoming firemen! Surprising how quickly it has all changed.
Vettel was a bit more impressive in Toro Rosso.
I'm pretty sure anyone else in Charlie Whiting's position would have done exactly the same....its a very tough decision to make. Personally I didn't really mind because I fully understand why the drivers, teams and the FIA are worried about extreme-poor visibility on a wet track.
Webber? I give him props for matching Vettel in output, but he crumbles way too often under pressure. Of the top guys... his losses are mostly due to his driving... not much else.
But I don't think he's consistent enough.
Though the same can be said of any of the top five drivers... which is why we have a top five instead of a top two or three...
Actually, Alonso said he'd do it back at Silverstone. So you're only, what ... three months late?Alonso's gonna take this WDC. You heard it here first.
Bad start here, bad drive there, lapses of judgement... (the silly punt of Hamilton... oops, lost my brakes, mate... the Vettel incident, I don't regard as his fault) There are points where he's leading the championship by quite a bit then does something... bizarre.
Admittedly, though, he's driven very, very well. But I don't think he's consistent enough.
Though the same can be said of any of the top five drivers... which is why we have a top five instead of a top two or three...
Well that is because Webber and Vettel have yet to secure a World Championship.
Stirling Moss is not a World Champion.
You've never heard of Pete Sampras?
I think Alonso is a prat, a whiner and a contemptible egoist... but boy is he delightful to watch.
He is 13...
Dude, I'm 23 and have no idea who Pete Sempras is. Then again, I don't care much for golf, so it's really of no surprise.
Even more surprising given that he's not a golfer.