I guess since everyones avoided the MR-S like the plague (I wonder why) ill use it again but not expecting much at one of the MR-Ses worse tracks..
).
Just wondering where you guys are at and what I should aim for, free practice no draft (slipstream<)
In my experience they have exactly the same wear rate, but in practice the softs last longer because they are still driveable when worn down, while the hards just become wet soap.
I noticed that too
Regarding your earlier remarks about the Cusco '08 being too fast I took the Apex and the Cusco for a couple laps at Laguna, and was at least one second faster in the Cusco.
It is not so much because of power, much more to do with handling, Apex being a tail snappy MR while the Cusco can be thrown around mercilessly and will always forgive you anyway.
But then, it might play out differently on other tracks, so I am not voting for a slower Cusco yet (at least not until saturday since I got it for friday's race
it also helped that the aliens had 150kgs+ ballast 
) with a car I just bought and ran in with a base tune 
.
)
. (I seem to stay up past 4am on weekends so shouldnt be to hard to stay up )
toyotsupra
Hmm, the Celica specs on the current sheet at 314hp, 1050kg which is supposedly Stock (it's not), running at 531PP.
It's got 322hp, 1050kg at Stock, 541PP.
If the car is reduced to 314hp, it only drops to 539PP.
So what spec is right?
.... but the MR-S isnt as bad as it was round here still twitchy but no where near as much.... A track I really like is Istanbul (On good ol Grid and F1) but theres more chance of me winning than that getting into GT5...
Hey guys, my semester is finally over
@ NTSC Drivers - how would everyone feel about moving the race earlier? ..say 2 hours? I'm thinking this would attract more drivers (concerning GT300).
