- 29,655
- Bratvegas
- GTP_Liquid
Liquid's Law
The longer a conversation goes on, the probability of someone mentioning Godwin's Law approaches 1.
Don't get me started on that ****, if you happen to be born with the wrong Chromosome you become a sex slave, I'm not advocating for feminism, but equal civil rights is something that does not exist there.
And there is Yemen too, if you want to use the occupied lands card, Bahrain as well.
I just clicked on this thread for fun, haven't read anything but your post.You saying that about women in Saudi is like if I said "Colombian's are drug dealer's". Unless you show me proof that all women in Saudi are sex slaves then I'll take your opinion on that as gibberish. In 2015 there was 38,043 Saudi women on scholarships by the government studying all over the world.
Equal rights don't exist in the majority of countries around the world. It doesn't even exist in most if not all "first world" countries. In fact, I don't know of any country that has complete and total equal rights between men and women. But according to the Global Gender Gap report that was revealed by the World Economic Forum late last year http://www.theweek.co.uk/67020/gender-equality-around-the-world-the-best-and-worst-countries, the top/closest countries are the Nordic countries. Colombia comes in 42nd place, so you should focus on your country maybe ? ... and why did you leave out your country with all the human trafficking, kidnappings, child and virgin sex slaves your drug lords own/run.
But on the other hand I'm not saying its 'all good in the hood' for women in Saudi. Still with all that were not even in the bottom ten of that same list. There are things that have less to do with Islam the religion, or misinterpretation of it, and more to do with tradition that some Saudi's still hold on to. And sometimes its just plain chivalrousness.
It all comes with time with the natural development of Saudi just like any other country in the world. At the same time we don't tell you how to run your country so please don't tell us how to run ours. But I want you to understand that Saudi is run by sharia law and what the majority of the people want, and that will never change.
As for your second topic. In Yemen, there is an elected government that is recognized by the UN including your country, and the former ousted president with some military leader's and the Huthii's tried to overturn that government and surrounded his house and government buildings with tanks that they had. The Yemeni government then asked the GCC (Gulf Cooperation Council) countries for help which they gladly provided with other Arab and other Muslim countries like Jordan, Morocco, Pakistan, Sudan. But no mass ground troops were deployed by the countries. Only Air and logistics support. So your "occupied" statement is untrue, misleading and unfounded.
The same with Bahrain. The so called "protester's" that have total loyalty to the "ًWilayat alFaqih" which now is Khamin'i now, and does what he says, and have no loyalty to their own country at all. Because in their belief you cannot be a Shi'ite otherwise. In fact you are considered a "Kafir" non-Muslim. Those "protester's" kill the police and anyone in the government and making future threats, attacking Sunni's, and burning government buildings. So when the Bahrain government asked the GCC countries for help, we gladly provided as well.
So how come you never mentioned Iran for occupying two U.A.E islands ? ... But I see you are on their side in an earlier post. And you actually think that Iran or Hizbullah or the Syrian government (Iran's little **tch, have the Golan heights still occupied by Israel since 1967) would do anything to Israel ever. They all say they can and will wipe Israel off the map but can't even free the Golan hill, let alone Palestine.
I am sorry everyone to be kinda off the thread subject but it was needed. My view on the thread topic is: Jewish people have been living in Palestine for a very long time peacefully before Islam and under the rule of Islam. But I don't agree with Zionism and the fact that they occupied Palestine.
No, it is a consequence of Yasser Arafat's death. With the possible exception of the Holy Roman Empire (which had leaders for both the State religion, Roman Catholicism (I.E. The Pope), and a Political leader), there is no government in the world that is as divisive as Palestine. Two governments, both founded around the time of, oh guess what, Israel's war with Lebanon. One, the West Bank, is ruled by the Fatah party, and the other, the Gaza Strip, is ruled by Hamas.
And guess which countries oppose the creation of the state of Palestine:
(Green:In favor, Red:Against, Yellow:Abstentions, Blue:Absent from session)
stainless steel
Not true. As I stated earlier, a divided Palestine was a result from Yasser Arafat's death, and rather than unite behind a chosen successor, they decided to play Game of Thrones instead for the right to rule the area. You haven't heard any news from a reputable news source (i.e The Jerusalem Post) from the area of a terror attack coming from the West Bank have you? No, they have all come from the tunnels of Gaza or the missiles thereof.You want to know why Gaza is so divided from the west bank, is because the stupid economic incursion and repeated violations of human rights in the area, of course a radical group will rise, that's the counter effect of creating a war on attrition towards a specific population.
That is the way that an economy is supposed to work. It is an endless cycle of money changing hands (either for people to buy goods or for companies to pay wages), all designed to help a nation grow and trade with other nations.So the world has this big problem of very few individuals amassing huge amounts of money, granted, money is a representative value but it has become so influential that it dictates how an economy should be run,
However, most countries don't trade military secrets willy nilly, like Nuclear missile technology. The countries that do have such technology are byproducts of the cold war, and said armaments are getting in there in years. Countries that, at the very least, the US trades Military arms with understand that we deal with conventional arms.the industrial military complex (and yeah, **** it, if I'm going to sound like a stupid conspiracy theorist, I will, because unfortunately that's the reality of the world) relies on jobs within the US and the UK to impulse their economies (BAE systems and Lockheed martin for example, they give people high tech jobs, and that people invest in their local economies), so both the US and the UK require military conflicts and political tensions in order to sell their weapons to the middle east (ironically Russia and France also benefit from this as they also develop weapon systems), and sell the technology to the middle east (Israel, Saudi arabia and whatever).
Source required. According to our last budget for fiscal year 2015, 16% of all Federal spending went into the Military.Meaning that they do require the business there so governments invest huge amounts of money (in the US is 25% of GDP, which is A LOT of money considering that the US has nearly 300 million inhabitants),
Is a matter of principle, I as a person wouldn't buy land where I know people was forcely displaced in order to built urban areas, and why do this people buy this, because of ****ign religion and the stupid entitlement of claiming a land that they didn't occupy in the first place, they had to work to get the materials to build those homes, they have to built those homes .. to then end up being destroyed by a ****ing government who is corrupt,
And yeah, I say kill the settlers, because you have to institute a policy of terror to get them out of there, not even the government themselves (Olmert try to de-occupy the Israeli settlers there, and they themselves didn't want to de-occupy the area) can do it, because they have to institute terror, that's the only thing that works, and one of the main reasons Hezbollah exists in the first place.
Oh, and @Hogh-Test ... children are killed in Palestine, a ****ing photo with some bunkers are not going to change my stance, is pretty stupid and shallow to use such such propagandistic methods to justify such actions, please grow the **** up.
I am putting more emphasis on local sources, not sources that are widely quoted like the AP for example.Jeruselum Post isn't the best source, whilst they do give an Isreali view point best they also defend it in basically all matters.
Indeed. CBS News and the New York Times are notorious for giving stories that already are heavily biased.I am putting more emphasis on local sources, not sources that are widely quoted like the AP for example.
Not really, no.l of you, you know what the real problem is, is capital, that is the real problem.
They did occupy it in the first place. The Arab invaders attacked, killed and drove them out in 1948.Is a matter of principle, I as a person wouldn't buy land where I know people was forcely displaced in order to built urban areas, and why do this people buy this, because of ****ign religion and the stupid entitlement of claiming a land that they didn't occupy in the first place,
What is it then?Not really, no.
I refuse to accept this, first because of the Nakba (which you are yet to mention, or even acknowledge which is a huge point in this discussion), and secondly because this conflict was aggravated by the influx of migrant Jews into the area who ended up creating the conflict in the first place (something that started from the 1920s to the late 1940s).They did occupy it in the first place. The Arab invaders attacked, killed and drove them out in 1948.
So since it's Israelis who live there now it belongs to them, right?What is it then?
The land belongs to the people who inhabits it, who works it and who populates it,
Are you asking what the problem is or what capitalism is?What is it then?
Yes, I'd noticedI refuse to accept this
At best that's simplified to the point of inaccuracy.secondly because this conflict was aggravated by the influx of migrant Jews into the area who ended up creating the conflict in the first place (something that started from the 1920s to the late 1940s).
Bit of a mystery why you don't apply this reasoning to the inter-war Jewish settlers who did just that before being attacked, killed and displaced in 1948...The land belongs to the people who inhabits it, who works it and who populates it, Jews in the area know this and that's why they started with the demolition of the settlers and their own construction.
Against all concepts of international law, which was even condemned in near unanimity by the UN. Nice way of quoting sentences while completely ignoring the rest of the of the paragraph.So since it's Israelis who live there now it belongs to them, right?
What is the problem in the region, why Israel gets away with what it gets away with?Are you asking what the problem is or what capitalism is?
Elaborate then, where is the inaccuracy?At best that's simplified to the point of inaccuracy.
And you keep ignoring the Nakba, or even addressing its existence.Bit of a mystery why you don't apply this reasoning to the inter-war Jewish settlers who did just that before being attacked, killed and displaced in 1948...
So since it's Israelis who live there now it belongs to them, right?
The problem is that is Israeli media source, which is pretty biased on itself, due to censorship towards the opposition.I am putting more emphasis on local sources, not sources that are widely quoted like the AP for example.
I just clicked on this thread for fun, haven't read anything but your post.
That said, as a male seemingly speaking on behalf of the women of Saudi, you sound quite full of 🤬. Very similar to the situation in America, where an all male panel was assigned to investigate a woman's right to chose. I would love to see a broad sample of women from Saudi who feel the same way you do.
Akira ACOh, and @Hogh-Test ... children are killed in Palestine, a ****ing photo with some bunkers are not going to change my stance, is pretty stupid and shallow to use such such propagandistic methods to justify such actions, please grow the **** up.
Akira ACAnd yeah, I say kill the settlers, because you have to institute a policy of terror to get them out of there, not even the government themselves (Olmert try to de-occupy the Israeli settlers there, and they themselves didn't want to de-occupy the area) can do it, because they have to institute terror, that's the only thing that works, and one of the main reasons Hezbollah exists in the first place.
I'm tired of being called misinformed or Hitler, Israel don't ****ign care about the UN, and Zionist use the Jews in WWII as a show to see themselves as victims when they have built a war of attrition based on the very same principles they were subjected to in the second world war, ironically they become almost the same as the ****ing Nazis, starving the population to death.
Someone who strangely keep posting in this thread even though he doesn't have anything of value to say.Who's Hogh-Test?
To be fair, a government that's sole goal is to eradicate their neighbor and never make peace will never be properly run if the nation cannot feasibly win.Palestine cannot even peacefully let alone successfully govern itself can it? Maybe that should happen first, just a thought...
Instead of resorting to a coherent argument you advocate to attacks towards to my person, personally I could not give a **** but if you advocate to such thing then ... is not worth dealing with someone like you.Paranoid delusionals such as yourself reach untold ecstasy in resisting 'oppression'. There are Jews. Deal with it. You're the stupid and shallow one, calling for violence. Religious reformers such as Muhammad ibn abd Al-Wahhab were concerned with the intent behind actions.
Funnily enough I'm not against the Jew, I'm against the Zionist conservatism, if you consider it as anti-semitic speech then you would be consider as the shallow and stupid, which bring the point of you being the one using Hebrew words and Nationalistic speech to prove your point, so I'm not sure who is being the religious nutjob here.Stupid and shallow. I suggest you polish up on the art of rhetoric. You come across as a paranoid delusional teenager whose Jewish math teacher made him redo his homework.
Instead of resorting to a coherent argument you advocate to attacks towards to my person, personally I could not give a **** but if you advocate to such thing then ... is not worth dealing with someone like you.
Oh, and @Hogh-Test ... children are killed in Palestine, a ****ing photo with some bunkers are not going to change my stance, is pretty stupid and shallow to use such such propagandistic methods to justify such actions, please grow the **** up.
Yes double standards, that's what happens when you get down to his level.Double standard?
Yeah, given your comments to me you're not in a position to take the high ground.Yes double standards, that's what happens when you get down to his level.