The 2020 George Floyd/BLM/Police Brutality Protests Discussion Thread

Human blockades have been utilized in peaceful protest for decades. People opposing racial injustice can bee seen utilizing it in the image I posted above, except in that instance it is being done indiscriminately; the apparent rationalization is that those who agree with us will understand and accept the inconvenience for the sake of change and those who don't agree with us deserve to be inconvenienced, but neither side of that rationalization is logical.


Lol so true.
“WE ARE PEACEFUL PROTESTERS WHO BLOCK PATHS OF OTHERS AND GO WHERE WE WANT TO EXPRESS OUR EMOTIONS PEACEFULLY”
“SO ARE WE”
 
Man, I just saw that Candace Owens video titled I don’t something Floyd omg.
Not sure what to think.
I’m not going to post it here but interested folks should search it up...
Thought provoking...
Especially about two thirds of the way through to the end...
This one?

(Language warning)


Unimpressed.
 
..some fowl language...

what-is-a-guinea-hen.jpg
 
:lol:

I love it. Oops!


Who the hell is Candace Owens?

*Google search*

Oh, PragerU, the group that understands the Constitution about as well as Trump. I think I'll pass.
For fun, I decided to check out the Conservapedia entry on her. I expected a lot, given that she's a pretty, black, conservative woman--a unicorn, basically--but was disappointed to find a rather nothing blurb.

Candace Owens (born 1989) is a conservative producer, political commentator, intellectual, and founder of the Blexit movement. She is especially well known for leaving the anti-Trump Democrat plantation to join the conservative movement against Antifa, Black Lives Matter, and the Left. On PragerU, she runs The Candace Owens Show, a series of intellectual debates between other intellectuals and herself. Subsequently, the lamestream media quickly labeled her as a "white supremacist" in many failed smear attacks due to her open opposition to liberal bigotry.

In October 2018, Owens had a misunderstanding with Kanye West over the use of a tradename on the design of a clothing line to promote Blexit: “I am blessed to say that this logo, these colors, were created by my dear friend and fellow superhero Kanye West.” West clarified a misunderstanding: "I introduced Candace to the person who made the logo and they didn’t want their name on it so she used mine." In a blog post, Owens apologized for misunderstanding and "any undue stress or pain the effort to correct [this] rumor has caused him, his business relationships, or his family. He simply never designed them."
That's it. I cleaned up the hyperlinks and citations so that it's easier to read here, but those are all still available if you follow the link I provided. It's worth nothing that the citation for the last sentence of the first paragraph takes you to a Rush Limbaugh blog entry that cites a tweet from Charlie Kirk, founder of Turning Point USA who hired her. The tweet doesn't offer any additional substantiation, and Kirk says stupid things on Twitter. They've obviously got pretty low standards for citations.

Of significantly more entertainment value was the talk page for the Conservapedia entry, at the top of which the person responsible for moderating the entry warned:


Hey, this article isn't suppose to be a hit piece. If you're going to put in trash, put something in to balance it out for NPOV. Otherwise all your hardwork in smearing somebody runs the risk of being removed.

I'll simply remove it as racist content and you risk being blocked for racist attacks.
If you have something critical to say about Owens, you have to balance it out with something nice. Failure to do so results in a flag for racism because apparently that's what criticism of a black person is, even if the criticism has absolutely nothing to do with them being black.

Ignore the abject stupidity of that for a moment and consider that such a notion seems very much at odds with Owens' brand.
 
This one?

(Language warning)


Unimpressed.

privlilege racist white male uses his privilige to whitesplain how a woman of colour is wrong on the riots.

Why not just post the Candace Owens video? Or explain to us where you think she is wrong? I already sat through the Owens video, I'm not going to watch a 40 minute Vaush video. (Not a fan of Owens, Prager U or Vaush)
 
given that she's a pretty, black, conservative woman--a unicorn, basically
I get where you're coming from, but Condi Rice says "hi".

privlilege racist white male uses his privilige to whitesplain how a woman of colour is wrong on the riots.

Why not just post the Candace Owens video? Or explain to us where you think she is wrong? I already sat through the Owens video, I'm not going to watch a 40 minute Vaush video. (Not a fan of Owens, Prager U or Vaush)
:lol: Finally, it's a thing. Perhaps you could explain where she is right rather than just shooting her critic down? I really don't want to give her any more clicks.
 
Last edited:
I get where you're coming from, but Condi Rice says "hi".

:lol: Finally, it's a thing. Perhaps you could explain where she is right rather than just shooting her critic down? I really don't want to give her any more clicks.
No point in explaining where I agree then.
 
So that makes it okay to summarily execute him in the street? Should be a quick acquittal, then. Otherwise, if he was "high on drugs" then maybe kneeling on his neck wasn't a great idea if Chauvin wanted him to survive until his trial.

Victim blaming.
 
Could it be because we keep hearing how Gorge Floyd was a good person. A big guy with a heart to match.
https://www.startribune.com/boss-re...od-friend-person-and-a-good-tenant/570775702/
Maybe he was to the people who knew him. Either way, he didn't deseve to die. I don't understand what motive people could have in bringing his memory down if not to delegitimize the protest against police brutality. To say that people should pack up their signs and go home because he might have had drugs in his system when the police killed him.
 
Maybe he was to the people who knew him. Either way, he didn't deseve to die. I don't understand what motive people could have in bringing his memory down if not to delegitimize the protest against police brutality.
From what I understood watching Owens video is she think that is not appropriate to use Floyd's character when protesting against police brutality.
 
From what I understood watching Owens video is she think that is not appropriate to use Floyd's character when protesting against police brutality.
I see. They should pick a squeaky clean poster child rather than someone who has been unquestionably unlawfully killed on camera while pleading for his life. Unless Owens thinks Floyd was a legitimate target then I don't see how pointing out his failings as a human being somehow makes what Chauvin did okay and the violence that protesters are complaining about justified.
 
It doesn't matter what George Floyd did or didn't do in his past. It doesn't matter if he saved kittens from burning buildings or kicked orphans.

All that matters is why the police were investigating him, and how much force they used.

He tried to use a fake 20 dollar bill and was drunk. The police responded by murdering him. The punishment far exceeds the crime. Should someone be murdered for a crime like this?

If you said yes, then you are literally advocating for the US to become North Korea.

Small crimes? Dead.

Disagree with administration? Dead.

Do anything you shouldn't be doing? Dead.

No more freedoms. No more rights. A police state. That's not what we should be wanting America.
 
Last edited:
I see. They should pick a squeaky clean poster child rather than someone who has been unquestionably unlawfully killed on camera while pleading for his life. Unless Owens thinks Floyd was a legitimate target then I don't see how pointing out his failings as a human being somehow makes what Chauvin did okay and the violence that protesters are complaining about justified.
You should definitely talk to her about this.
 
It is absolutely possible to hold, simultaneously, the opinions that Floyd's history with drugs, theft and armed robbery, and the situation on that day where he (knowingly or not) tried to pass a counterfeit $20 while also on fentanyl and meth, are unpleasant and criminal and mark him out as considerably less than angelic person whose net contribution to a fair and peaceful society was negative and that none of that excuses a police officer essentially hanging him to death on the ****ing floor.


These are not opposed viewpoints. There is not a death penalty for being a ****.
 
Last edited:
You should definitely talk to her about this.
I'm sure I'm not the only person holding these views and others who do are probably in a better position to make their voices heard by her than some rando on an internet forum like me. In fact, I'd be surprised if they haven't already done so.
 
Last edited:
So summary roadside police executions of your "bad" people are warranted at what threshold? Speeding? Drugs in the system? Theft? To be clear I'm not confusing this case with cases where citizen officers have felt a genuine need to defend themselves from deadly force.
I have no idea what are you trying to say. Do you have any idea how do I feel about the murder of Gorge Floyd, racism or police brutality? If not I would appreciate if you don't quote me when you have no idea what the post is about.
 
The hidden costs of police misconduct are mounting up. What can be done about the root causes? Economic reform? Reform of police departments? If reforms cost money we don't have, is the reform worth borrowing for?
There have been protests in nearly 150 cities nationwide amid calls for justice in the police killing of George Floyd, an unarmed Black man in Minneapolis. Some of the protests have involved destruction of property and looting.

Instances of police misconduct, however, come with their own costs: costs to the psyche, costs to community trust and economic costs. It’s not just direct financial costs to municipalities and taxpayers, though. There are long-term, generational economic tolls that come as a consequence of police brutality.

In a 2017 University of Hawaii Law Review article titled “How Much is Police Brutality Costing America?” author Eleanor Lumsden lays out several examples:

  • Absent Black fathers leave children without adequate support. Such children may then be left to fend for themselves in a school system that often serves as a pipeline to prison instead of a path to higher education.
  • There are also indirect costs to communities that accrue from losing spouses, parents, teachers, mentors or friends.
  • Communities also pay the costs for additional police for marches, disruption of traffic and commerce, and any destruction to property that may result from riots. Poor, minority communities want law and order just as much as any other demographic, yet they are the ones who are most immediately affected by police brutality and individual or collective responses to it.
Marc Morial, president and CEO of the National Urban League, the civil rights organization, says another “hidden cost” of police misconduct is the money that cities have to pay victims in civil judgments.

“The public knows nothing about it. Many times it’s hidden behind confidentiality agreements, attorney-client privilege. It’s not discussed,” Morial, also the former mayor of New Orleans, said.

“The 10 cities with the largest police departments paid out $248.7 million in 2014 in settlements and court judgments in police-misconduct cases,” The Wall Street Journal reported in 2015.

In just the first eight weeks of 2018, Chicago paid out $20 million in police misconduct lawsuits, according to a local news investigation.

New York City pays by far the most. In 2017, it paid a record $302 million for police misconduct lawsuits, according to the city controller’s office.

Morial spoke with “Marketplace Morning Report” host David Brancaccio about this. The following is an edited transcript of their conversation.

David Brancaccio: Now the anger we’ve been seeing in streets across the country was sparked by the killing of a man by a policeman. It is a murder case, people want justice. Racial divides play a key role in this issue of police brutality nationally, but what do you think about economic divides?

Marc Morial: The economic divide that we face in America underlies many of the other disparities. It underlies health disparities. It underlies housing disparities. It underlies many quality-of-life disparities that exist in America today. The economic divide, the growing income inequality, the widening of the racial wealth gap. What Americans should understand is that we’ve gone backwards when it comes to this notion of the American dream being achievable and attainable for all, and this notion that people that work, if they work, can basically make enough money to make ends meet. And on top of that we’ve had a disinvestment in many of America’s urban communities. You’ll see glittering downtowns, next to deteriorating neighborhoods. And the recession of 2008 to 2011 or so really exacerbated that divided, caused great challenges with respect to housing, great losses of wealth and housing. And those neighborhoods were not reinvested in. They were not, if you will, given a Marshall Plan, or a [Trouble Asset Relief Program], or any other sort of sustainability. And now, to some extent, the bills are coming in, or I might dare say the chickens are coming home to roost.

Brancaccio: Now I saw Keith Ellison quoted the other day, Minnesota’s Attorney General and former congressman, and he says he’s been feeling like the neighborhoods where he goes running have felt on edge, I mean, before the George Floyd killing, because of the mess that was caused by the pandemic, on top of what you’ve just been talking about.

Morial: So it’s a combination of factors. I think Attorney General Ellison is right. Look, the COVID ⁠— you’ve got 40 million plus people out of work. You’ve got a Black unemployment rate at 17%. Latino unemployment rate at 18%. A white unemployment rate at 14%. You’ve gone from Jan. 1 of this year, where we had record levels of employment and record low levels of unemployment. And then now, just not even six months later, we’ve got record unemployment, record job losses, on top of that, police brutality and racial violence has come into focus in a clear and in an ugly way. These cases ⁠— George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, if you will, Ahmaud Arbery ⁠— we have videotapes in two of the three. We’ve got a disturbing 911 call in the third. The evidence has laid bare so much of what we’ve been talking about for years.

Brancaccio: Now across the country we invest money in policing to make communities safer. I know you think a lot about additional ways to use money to make communities safer. It’s not just policing.

Morial: Policing is a component of making a community better or indeed making a community safer. Quality housing is important. Solid, strong infrastructure, good streets, good parks, good playgrounds, good libraries, good schools, good community centers that are, if you will, operational, that that feel good, look good, operate well ⁠— that helps to make a neighborhood. Paved streets, if you will, public plantings and trees ⁠— all of these make neighborhoods and give neighborhoods quality of life. People who have the opportunity to earn a good living when they work hard all day, that makes for a good neighborhood. And we’ve seen this steady but slow deterioration.

When the economy came back after the recession. It really came back for America’s wealthiest, America’s well-off citizens. For America’s middle class, America’s working class, America’s poor, they’ve struggled. Real income
in America has not kept pace with inflation for the last 30 years. That’s the fact, and that’s the reality that so many Americans face ⁠— coming into the pandemic, coming into the virus and certainly even before the Floyd, Arbery and Breonna Taylor cases.

Brancaccio: Cities pay out a lot of money in these police brutality cases. New York spent, I think it was like $230 million on police misconduct payouts in 2018 alone. Chicago spends a fortune. Small cities, as well ⁠— I was looking at Long Beach, California, spent $30 million in a recent five-year period. I mean, you ran a city, New Orleans, Mr. Morial. You’d think that the money that cities have to pay victims would incentivize more reform.

Morial: This is an outrage, and this is what I call one of the hidden costs of police misconduct: that cities pay out millions and millions of dollars in civil judgments. The public knows nothing about it. Many times it’s hidden behind confidentiality agreements, attorney-client privilege. It’s not discussed.

You know, I inherited, when I took over as mayor, a number of very, very large lawsuits and, you know, it stretched our ability to execute police reform. And, in some instances, I believe Cleveland is one, they’ve actually issued tax-exempt bonds. They’re paying interest in fees in which they borrowed money to pay off judgments that were as a result of the consent decree that they were under.

Brancaccio: Essentially, you’re talking about police misconduct bonds. In other words, we need to borrow from people to be able to pay this stuff and they route that through Wall Street.

Morial: And they pay fees and they pay interest. And, you know, it’s not like we borrowed money to build a new community center, or borrowed money to build a new library, or borrowed money to improve a school. You have cities out there borrowing money to pay off judgments because of brutal and corrupt police officers. And, look, this has got to stop this. We should have, and we should have as a goal, a nation of constitutional policing. One of the things that that really struck me about the George Floyd case is that you had four officers seeking to apprehend a man for a “violation involving $20.” What kind of use of resources is it for four men, who are probably ⁠— whatever their salaries are, but they’re certainly paid, you know, more than $20 an hour ⁠— four men to spend all that time trying to apprehend, and, if you will, ultimately taking this man’s life, throwing him on the ground and handcuffing him, for what? For what? A $20 bill? Allegedly a $20 bill?

Reform of policing is deep. It also means how you deploy your resources, where you put your focus. I want to see police departments put their focus on violent crime, put their focus on drug dealers and drug pushers, put their focus on things that really, really make a community unsafe, and not spend so much time harassing people for petty things or arresting people for petty things, and, by doing so, creating friction in the community and making the whole notion of police community relations just an illusion.
https://www.marketplace.org/2020/06...olice-misconduct-cases-settlements-judgments/
 
Back