- 15,532
- Cairo, Egypt
- GTP_SEMS
Someone who deserves some praise is Carlos Sainz, I don't think there is much between him and Max when they were teammates.
Verstappen wins Driver of the Day
http://www.formula1.com/content/fom...riverOfTheDay_for_Spain_-_Max_Verstappen.html
You forgot the soundtrack....
Missed opportunityYou forgot the soundtrack....
How is it cheating? It's a device designed to aid overtaking because the cars generate too much downforce to pass each other. Without it, you'd be complaining about the lack of overtaking.the DRS cheat mode
How is it cheating? It's a device designed to aid overtaking because the cars generate too much downforce to pass each other. Without it, you'd be complaining about the lack of overtaking.
Not really, since without DRS, there would be no gap to go for in the first place.in modern F1 the thought of Senna's "if there is a gap" tripe can be rendered obsolete
In order for it to be a cheat mode it would only be available to select few. It is available to all therefore cannot be considered a cheat mode. Cheap yes, a band aid yes. Cheating no.My point is DRS can be used on the straights so in modern F1 the thought of Senna's "if there is a gap" tripe can be rendered obsolete.
I know you have had a hard time from the Lewis fanclub in this thread but please don't try to start on me mate... to me IMO DRS is a bit of joke and a band aid at best for the lack of overtaking, thats my opinion one not shared by all but shared by some...ok.. Vettle once referred to it as a cheat mode or words to that effect, admittedly that was after he'd been passed by Lewis who was using it so he was a little angry... swings and round about's..
No strategy is guaranteed to work and neither Ferrari or Red Bull could be certain whether the 2 or the 3 stop strategy would be optimal, so they both elected for split strategies. The 2 stop strategy was arguably higher risk but paid off - but I reckon that was more down to luck than any tactical nous on behalf of RBR.I find it interesting that Verstappen wins the instant he jumps in a Red Bull... As if they are prioritising him over Ricciardo... Especially because his strategy was botched.
Bec
In order for it to be a cheat mode it would only be available to select few. It is available to all therefore cannot be considered a cheat mode. Cheap yes, a band aid yes. Cheating no.
If I were to be as pedantic as most then well it isn't actually available to all at the same time..is it? In fact that's its very point...
I thought that at first but if you look at it, both Ferrari and red bull put their #1 drivers on one stray and the #2s on another. It just happened that the #2s strategy workedI find it interesting that Verstappen wins the instant he jumps in a Red Bull... As if they are prioritising him over Ricciardo... Especially because his strategy was botched.
Yes, it is. Any driver who crosses the line within a second of the preceding car (irrespective of race position) has the opportunity to use their drag reduction system in the subsequent zone(s).
I think you'll struggle to find a way to match that to a definition of "cheating" in any sense of the word.
Firstly it was a throw away phrasing "DRS Cheat mode"
secondly it was my opinion
thirdly if the car in front has no DRS and the car following uses DRS to pass the car then it can be called if i want to, a cheat mode...
Firstly it was a throw away phrasing "DRS Cheat mode", secondly it was my opinion, thirdly if the car in front has no DRS and the car following uses DRS to pass the car then it can be called if i want to, a cheat mode... I can call it what the hell i want frankly, its a pathetic devise IMO.
The point you allude to is when car can grab DRS from car in front which then renders the whole thing pointless so it just cancels itself out as if DRS didn't exist...
DRS along with other silly ideas in F1 are to appeal to the Britains Got Talent / ToWIE mouth breathers.
It really is disappointing that next years regs are supposedly allowing more aero development, it's the complete opposite of what is needed.
As much i dislike the idea of DRS, without it they'd be almost no overtaking in F1. They are just to aerodynamically sensitive to follow another car through a medium-quick corner to get enough 'natural' drag to make a pass. They've tried slashing the size of wings and enforcing other wing-related regulations, but it didn't make much difference. DRS was an ugly fix to a problem that needed sorting.
I hate this notion that a faster driver can get get stuck behind a slower one... you can get stuck behind them yes but your stuck because you can't pass them! Thats racing!
Vettle...Roseburg...Roseburg...
IIRC it pretty much came into effect due to Alonso getting stuck behind Petrov and Vettle won the WDC.
That was more down to how the cars were geared and/or what degree of downforce they had dialled in before the race.
That's your assessment, that it has zero to do with wake turbulence?
Exactly and a knee jerk reaction they thought of DRS... that reason and for the dense masses who need 'entertaining'.. like i say, the X Factor bunch..
true fans of Motorsport don't want all this fake rubbish.