Would you like me to quote myself a third time? I know it happens at certain angles, maybe most angles as I have said before. The poster I replied to makes it seem like that happens at almost all angles which simply isnt the case.
It may be slightly smoother but like what was brought up in one of the other threads, the GT version might actually be too narrow. The FM4 version looks just about right in width.
![]()
Both those screens you could fit 3 cars alongside each other. Im not sure you could in GT5?
Couldn't tell it apart from Forza?......![]()
I'm sorry you lost me. That picture looks nothing like FM, I thought he thought they both were real.
Yeah, that's why I edited. Realized that was the problem, not my original take on it.
Old news is old.Anyways only 25 cars can do Autovista Mode. That's a bummer.
Old news is old.
Anyways, there are several reviews up now, most of them rating the game somewhere around the same mark... Enough stuff to avoid the few biased ones![]()
MoGoSpeedWell darn that's kinda BS on the autovista mode.
There's over 10 hours of content apparently.
That's more than some full games.
MoGoSpeedMeh. It's still kinda booboo. That's just me though. Unless that mean s there's only 25 premiums.![]()
Dunno. Depends on who you're talking to. Around here, most people seem to be racers, drifters, painters and tuners, I think. It's a nice gimmick and all that, but not really important.Well darn that's kinda BS on the autovista mode.
It's more like only having 25 museum cards. Because that's much closer to what Autovista is than the premiums.Meh. It's still kinda booboo. That's just me though. Unless that mean s there's only 25 premiums.![]()
It's little bit of an oddball, definitely. On the other hand, it'll have its place on the field if a nice car soccer matchI just don't like that they included the H1 Hummer. I would have much liked a GT1/3 car to explore.
It did? The gear shift animations were part of the first patch and as far as I can remember it was a couple weeks after launch.
Oh, well I apologize for misunderstanding you. I was only posting because the person I replied to IMO said that all photos have pixelation. And that's the only reason why I posted my pics. Just to prove his comments wrong. Sorry that we were on the same page and didn't know it. No hard feelings man.And all I'm saying is, posting pictures that aren't pixelated because of the angle you've chosen doesn't mean a thing. That's all.
The camera is far away from the car in both of your pictures. If you want a clear picture of the car within 2-5 m, you will see the pixels. Your shots are not proving anything.
When the car is barely seen in the picture, it is clear that the problems arent that visable at all.
My bad, I might have come off as too harsh myselfOh, well I apologize for misunderstanding you. I was only posting because the person I replied to IMO said that all photos have pixelation. And that's the only reason why I posted my pics. Just to prove his comments wrong. Sorry that we were on the same page and didn't know it. No hard feelings man.![]()
You did the same thing the other member did. When you take a photo with the car being shown through/behind the smoke, the pixelation will rarely occur. Take a shot of the smoke with car in shown in front of the smoke trail & it becomes apparent 9/10 times.Here are my smoke and snow filled shots. I did ZERO editing to mask any pixels.
Ford GT, STI in the snow
It's all good![]()
You did the same thing the other member did. When you take a photo with the car being shown through/behind the smoke, the pixelation will rarely occur. Take a shot of the smoke with car in shown in front of the smoke trail & it becomes apparent 9/10 times.
I guess I'll just listen to JC's rants and that's going to be it, most likely. If I want some info on a car, I'll just google it. Same thing I said about GT5's museum, really.
Listening to Clarkson could make it semi-interesting, at least.
I won't be surprised if the biggest criticism of the cars in autovista is that they need more power.