FM Vs GT - Discussion Thread (read the first post before you post)

  • Thread starter Scaff
  • 8,743 comments
  • 540,873 views
I dont want it to be. But can GT recover? That has me wondering. Forza seems to be the new racing king and so many jumped ship. I'm reluctant to because the series is pretty much part of my childhood. :sly:

It's like a bunch of Ford guys, Chevy guys, and Mopar guys, standing with thier cars in a parking lot, all arguing who's cars are the best. Doesn't matter if one of the groups' cars all suddenly decide to explode, all at exactly the same time, the hardcore guys of that group will still insist they're driving the best. :lol: I wouldn't worry.
 
Last edited:
NA
It's like a bunch of Ford guys, Chevy guys, and Mopar guys, standing with thier cars in a parking lot, all arguing who's cars are the best. Doesn't matter if one of the groups cars all suddenly decide to explode all at the same time. The hardcore guys of any group will still insist they're driving the best. :lol:

Just had to bring Ferrari into it didn't you.:lol:


:sly:
 
This topic has been visited to death and back already. This video has already been posted also. Supposedly it's some sort of glitch with 900° wheels that causes an assist. At least that is what we are being told.
 
Plus that's a demo.....
We could go over problems with GT5P?
But then again that was a demo released as a full game, instead of well, you know a demo.
 
Because problems are being brought up like they are set in stone.
The game is not even out yet, there is time for last minute patches.

By internet on release day, yes, possible, but I won't be surprised if it takes a bit longer. We'll see though. I can wait a bit otherwise.
 
Patches and changes take a lot more time and effort than you think they do.

If the demo was available 1-2 months before release? Maybe but the demo was released 10 days prior to release. The time to fix the problem itself and other issues that have popped up (the super glare cars for example) plus the time it would take for certification.

I doubt we will be seeing any sort of update until at least a month after release and that's if T10 even decide to fix it.
 
Patches and changes take a lot more time and effort than you think they do.

If the demo was available 1-2 months before release? Maybe but the demo was released 10 days prior to release. The time to fix the problem itself and other issues that have popped up (the super glare cars for example) plus the time it would take for certification.

I doubt we will be seeing any sort of update until at least a month after release and that's if T10 even decide to fix it.

+1

Yeah, that's what I ment by a bit longer. They'd really have to do a rush job, bypass procedure, and do a bit of finger crossing to have it out on release.
 
I think the problem here is the Demo should have been out much sooner than it was for FM4, but GT5P was out a year before GT5 and it still needed heavy patchwork before people became happy with owning the game.
 
Patches and changes take a lot more time and effort than you think they do.

If the demo was available 1-2 months before release? Maybe but the demo was released 10 days prior to release. The time to fix the problem itself and other issues that have popped up (the super glare cars for example) plus the time it would take for certification.

I doubt we will be seeing any sort of update until at least a month after release and that's if T10 even decide to fix it.

The demo was the E3 code, with some additional cars and rivals mode. I doubt that we will see big changes in comparison to the final game, but we will know next week.

It wont definetly be any different in the graphics department.

So is the GT series dead?
i0mEiEMK7zldU.jpg
 
The demo was the E3 code, with some additional cars and rivals mode. I doubt that we will see big changes in comparison to the final game, but we will know next week.

It wont definetly be any different in the graphics department.

No. The lighting is very different from what was shown at E3. It is not the E3 build.
 
FyreandIce
It did? The gear shift animations were part of the first patch and as far as I can remember it was a couple weeks after launch.

You are right that it wasn't day one. Very soon after though.

Oddly. As a cockpit user I never even noticed they were not using there hands to change gear until somebody told me.

After that it bugged the hell out of me. Buy it wasn't long before fixed.

One thing is for sure is that certification for this patch won't have as much red tape to go through. Microsoft will just roll it though the process a lot quicker.
 
Oopsie. My rather frank return to gt5 impression appears to have caused a fanboy to implode. Anyway, perhaps I should expand on my original post.

I am a bike race mechanic in my spare time, my rider was struggling in the club championship we were running in so I moved in with him to be more involved in the team time wise. He isn't what you would call an avid gamer; hasn't owned a console since a ps1. He has sat with me, played some fm3 and was enthralled by the fm4 demo along with other games on both consoles, but I sold gt5 before I moved in with him so he has never seen it being played, isn't on forums so he is essentially free of bias. All he knows is the adverts and hype for gt5 from me talking about it before it was released.

So I fired the game up and it dld the updates and reloaded my game. I went straight into the photo travel with my lambo in the cafe scene. First words out of his mouth 'holy ****, that looks better than forza' which it does. Then I went to do a snow rally as it was the event I was halfway through when I lost interest and using a premium subaru it booted up and he said, 'jesus Christ, that looks like v rally on the ps1'. Which made me laugh so much I missed the start of the rally. It kind of sums up the enigma of gt5 really, it can go from unbelievably glorious triumph to crap mediocrity in the space of a couple of menus. so yeah still plan on grinding through it a bit more, but when forza 4 comes out it's in danger of looking very dated, to me at least.
 
Last edited:
The screwed up alpha blending is constantly a hassle in any rain/snow/dirty/smoke-filled shot.
Here are my smoke and snow filled shots. I did ZERO editing to mask any pixels.
Ford GT, STI in the snow

his is true when you are actually driving. It is true when you are watching a replay. And it is true when you actually stop to take a photo. You either cherry pick angles to take photos until you find one where alpha blending doesn't even come in contact with an edge of a car (or is very, very thin), or you post-process the image until the jaggies go away. There is no third option.[/color][/b][/font]
Well, you did catch me there. I don't watch replays and I use the "bumper cam" so I don't sit and stare at all the dust/ snow/ etc... coming off my car. But just for the sake of this discussion, I will take a closer look at different car angles and watch some replays after work. Cause if I am so wrong, I would like to be corrected. BTW, you did quote me in saying there is pixelation when photographing so I am not sure why you don't think I believe that. :boggled:
 
Here are my smoke and snow filled shots. I did ZERO editing to mask any pixels.
Ford GT, STI in the snow
You can, of course, alyways select an angle at which the smoke or snow won't cause the car to appear pixelated.

What it does, though: It forces you to go with an angle at which it doesn't. I've done that myself to get some pixelation-free shots with smoke somewhere.

You can, of course, reply that you wanted to use nothing but that specific angle and no other, of course. You could also reply that you wouldn't ever want to use one of the numerous angles at which the pixelation becomes appearent,

I, however, do. I don't want to always make sure the smoke is between the car and the camera. At times, I want the car to be between the camera and the smoke. Because, to me, that would be a better photo. And as soon as I want to do that - bam, pixelation.
 
Would you like me to quote myself a third time? I know it happens at certain angles, maybe most angles as I have said before. The poster I replied to makes it seem like that happens at almost all angles which simply isnt the case.
 
Back