- 2,503
- Prince George's
- Team-Piggysmalls
xXKingJoshXxThe turbo 4cyl is just fine. If you wanted more power you could get it out of the engine already in it. The V6 would weigh more, as well.
Understandable.
xXKingJoshXxThe turbo 4cyl is just fine. If you wanted more power you could get it out of the engine already in it. The V6 would weigh more, as well.
ToronadoThey should put a VR6 in it; but there's no reason for a V6 diesel. This isn't an executive car, and the chassis most certainly wasn't designed for the nearly 400 lb ft of torque that the current V6 TDI puts out.
They should make a Rsi version again.
xXKingJoshXxThey just announced pricing for the new R-line Beetles, but I don't know how much like the RSI Beetles they are.
Link.
30k is expensive. I could get a used quatrro for that price. Even a FR-S could destroy it around the track.
I was the only person that actually liked the pre-facelift TL. Of course, I think the facelifted TL looks much better though. One of the few nice looking crisp designs currently being sold.
Any car ruined by US-spec 5mph crash bumpers. Legislation by aesthetic-less lawyers...typical.
Then of course there were also changes to the lights of a lot of cars in the US, the worst examples for me being the rear lights of the Countach and Esprit. Anyone know what regs dictated this? Seemed a tendency to change everything to quad lights, or make them smaller.
As I understand it, the whole point of the regulation was to protect consumers.Wikipedia - Bumper_(automobile)#Weakening_standardsFacing pressure from automakers, and operating under the Reagan administration's pledge to reduce regulatory burdens on industry, NHTSA most recently amended the bumper standard in May 1982...
...
Consumer and insurance groups have decried the weakened bumper standard, saying it has increased consumer costs without any attendant benefits except to automakers.
...
The weakened regulations permitted automakers to design bumpers with emphasis on style and low cost; protection dropped substantially and repair costs rose. In 1990, IIHS conducted four crash tests on three different-year examples of the Plymouth Horizon. The results illustrated the effect of the changes to the U.S. bumper regulations (repair costs quoted in 1990 United States dollars):
- 1983 Horizon with Phase-II 5-mph bumpers: $287
- 1983 Horizon with Phase-I 2.5-mph bumpers: $918
- 1990 Horizon: $1,476
^ The u.s. federal regulations on headlights through the mid 20th century are described here. In 1983 the law was amended to accept "aerodynamic" designs, in the chase for fuel economy.
Have to agree, you could pull up a chair and eat your dinner off of some. Also a little annoying when it affected the models in other countries (MGs took on the plastic bumpers elsewhere too, presumably because they were all manufactured in the same place?) Also spoils the look of a lot of cars in Forza, as they are modelled on US-spec versions.
Then of course there were also changes to the lights of a lot of cars in the US, the worst examples for me being the rear lights of the Countach and Esprit. Anyone know what regs dictated this? Seemed a tendency to change everything to quad lights, or make them smaller.
Sorry to say but I really dislike BMW's.
All current BMW's I dislike. They all look the same. The M3 is just a bigger 1,3,5 series sedan. The M5 is just a heavier/tuned M3 with a V10. The only BMW I approve is the Z3,Z4, M1, i8, F1 race cars, V12 LMR.
I know that the US only allowed sealed beam headlamps from the 40s through the nineties, and until 1975 you could only have single or dual round lights. After '75, you could also fit rectangular lights of a certain size.
Jesus Christ, WTF is that monstrosity?
So much wrong in 1 car design!
All current BMW's I dislike. They all look the same. The M3 is just a bigger 1,3,5 series sedan. The M5 is just a heavier/tuned M3 with a V10. The only BMW I approve is the Z3,Z4, M1, i8, F1 race cars, V12 LMR.
ermm... Wut?