- 1,208
- San Diego
- RedReevos / GTP_RedReevos
I spent a little time on the Nurb GP/F last night. I ran it both with chassis rigidity and without. I tried different ways of getting to 502hp. What I found is it is all about the same. The tunes are different for the chassis rigidity and without.
I ran a 2'00.8xx. I can see about .5 more with a good lap. Not sure yet how to hit the 1'59s.
Schulze tune no chassis rigidity:
8/0
15.0/12.5
7/6
7/6
4/5
3.0/2.2
-.05/-.10
5/11/5 5/11/5
BB 3/6
trans - I never really mess with.. just lowered to 168 top
Schulze tune with chassis rigidity:
12/0
15.0/12.5
4/3
4/3
3/4
3.0/2.2
-.05/-10
5/11/5 5/11/5
BB 3/6
Both of these cars handle well. I like the feel a little better of the one without the chassis rigidity, but the one with gives me slightly more consistent times.
And, yes, I believe the higher front does help with the understeer in these events. That is not to say I use the same method in online rooms.
Hope this helps a few of you -data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4b7b7/4b7b73a124e20d96f53b3835c3b7814a847ec36c" alt="Cheers! :cheers: :cheers:"
edit - max d/f
I ran a 2'00.8xx. I can see about .5 more with a good lap. Not sure yet how to hit the 1'59s.
Schulze tune no chassis rigidity:
8/0
15.0/12.5
7/6
7/6
4/5
3.0/2.2
-.05/-.10
5/11/5 5/11/5
BB 3/6
trans - I never really mess with.. just lowered to 168 top
Schulze tune with chassis rigidity:
12/0
15.0/12.5
4/3
4/3
3/4
3.0/2.2
-.05/-10
5/11/5 5/11/5
BB 3/6
Both of these cars handle well. I like the feel a little better of the one without the chassis rigidity, but the one with gives me slightly more consistent times.
And, yes, I believe the higher front does help with the understeer in these events. That is not to say I use the same method in online rooms.
Hope this helps a few of you -
edit - max d/f
Last edited: