- 1,845
- Durham, N.C.
- otakukid965
I have no words to describe how I feel after this race. The important thing is that Massa and Perez are okay.
Do you not understand English or are you that blind? Psychologists have a name for that condition.Bad luck, looks like you're putting words in your own mouth there, bad luck dude
He DID set the fastest lap as everyone else who watched the race and timing accepts. Just accept you were wrong before you get asked for a citation to prove that you saw something which nobody else did.
Be careful of fanboyism, it marks you out in this kind of adult discussion as "unreliable".
I acknowledged all of that while the race was going on. Go back and read my post. I mentioned he gained an advantage, but there's no penalty for doing that when you're at the front because it doesn't change the order. In the past they've only given penalties when they felt the driver did it deliberately.The point is, after he missed his braking point and got off the brakes, he took the straightest, fastest line he could across the runoff area, far, far off the track, and had the throttle down the whole way.
So, yes... that was pretty fast.
-
Mind you... this is as an impartial observer. I noted that his move on Lewis early on was entirely fair, given the same logic followed in Lewis' defense against him in Bahrain (you can't expect a driver to give up the outside of a corner exit because the racing line naturally moves that way).
But leaving the track IS illegal under the rules.
A driver leaving the track and gaining a position is expected to return the position. There's no specific guideline for what a driver does if he leaves it in front of another driver and doesn't lose one. How do you give back, exactly, half a second?
Thus there's no specific penalty for that.
Which comes back to a much earlier argument... are you for or against the exploitation of the "gray areas" of the rules? Because, like it or not, however nice the driver's personality may be, that is exactly what happened today.
Regarding the chicane I think they really do need to look at making sure anyone taking the easy way out aren't able to drive through at speed. Mistakes happen and people miss their braking points accidentally but it needs to be punished by making the alternative route slower.
I don't understand why they left a small gap there, if it's there then what's the point of having it there because a driver is always going to take the easier route.
They could employ something similar to the first chicane at Monza and stick up plastic bollard/sign things to make the drivers weave about.Two sets of those sausage kerbs (where there is currently one) and continuing these kerbs all the way and not leaving the gap would prevent the possibility of a driver flooring it and gaining a load of time for a mistake.
Do you not understand English or are you that blind? Psychologists have a name for that condition.
. I mentioned he gained an advantage, but there's no penalty for doing that when you're at the front because it doesn't change the order. In the past they've only given penalties when they felt the driver did it deliberately.
Instead of facing facts you just insult people, he set the fastest lap of the race at the time out of nowhere, deal with it.
Regarding the chicane I think they really do need to look at making sure anyone taking the easy way out aren't able to drive through at speed. Mistakes happen and people miss their braking points accidentally but it needs to be punished by making the alternative route slower.
I almost fell asleep on the first third of the race, and then the Mercedes guys started duking it out. It got really exciting from that point on. It was also an exciting end, but for the wrong reasons. Good to know Perez and Massa are okay though.
Shocking that half the field wound up retiring. That's the highest attrition rate I've seen in a Formula 1 race.
Congrats to Ricciardo for his first GP win!
Instead of facing facts you just insult people, he set the fastest lap of the race at the time out of nowhere, deal with it.
Any closer and not even Mutual of Red Bull wouldn't have saved Vettel!![]()
Damn that was close.
Hitting one of those at the sort of speeds Nico and Lewis did there could have launched them back on track though, possibly causing a much greater incident. I agree something should be done, but perhaps given the various possible risks attached to the different solutions, the current layout might be the best compromise.The way I always look at these things is what would have happened if that was a wall/barrier? Nico would have either hit it or slowed down even further to make sure he didn't. He took the easy way out because it was there.
Perhaps the best idea is a chicane of sleeping policeman, like they have on a few tracks.
Any closer and not even Mutual of Red Bull wouldn't have saved Vettel!![]()
Well done to Ricciardo for winning and for staying in front of Vettel (again)... Mercedes unlucky and not so unbeatable but i'm sure that the next races will return to dominate the Championship. Come on Rosberg!!! Let's hope you win the title. Williams very good and Perez should be penalized next race for the accident he caused... why he moved to the center at the last? hope Massa is ok. Ferrari no comment
I think it has been worse.![]()
It's there to give drivers a way out. They can't go back on the track over the kerbs because it damages the car, and they can't rejoin head-on against traffic coming from the straight. If you're goiig to argue they must be punished then add a gravel trap.I don't understand why they left a small gap there, if it's there then what's the point of having it there because a driver is always going to take the easier route.
Here:Show me where he said he cut the corner on purpose.
And confirmation:So you missed Rosberg setting fastest lap by cutting the last corner at full speed?
@dhandeh happy?Probably because he'd used up a bit more trying to close in or he was told to fuel save, I wonder what trick he'll have up his sleeve next time out...
![]()
Damn that was close.
For?@BHRxRacer, where's the citation?![]()
Hitting one of those at the sort of speeds Nico and Lewis did there could have launched them back on track though, possibly causing a much greater incident. I agree something should be done, but perhaps given the various possible risks attached to the different solutions, the current layout might be the best compromise.
It may be a grey area, but it's hard to enforce. As for the sportsmanship discussion, Nico didn't do it on purpose so there's no issues there. If you want to start an argument against him, start it about the first lap thing.
For?
Regarding the chicane I think they really do need to look at making sure anyone taking the easy way out aren't able to drive through at speed. Mistakes happen and people miss their braking points accidentally but it needs to be punished by making the alternative route slower.
@ Everybody
If you're going to report me I'm reporting all of you for trolling. It's honestly unbelievable that I must repeat myself 100 times, and then you respond with the same thing. At least @LMSCorvetteGT2 had the decency to flat out call me a liar last time.
For?
It's there to give drivers a way out. They can't go back on the track over the kerbs because it damages the car, and they can't rejoin head-on against traffic coming from the straight. If you're goiig to argue they must be punished then add a gravel trap.
Here:
And confirmation:
@dhandeh happy?
But how?
Indeed. Brake failure there would still be a scary prospect though.Putting them on the perimeter after the corner entry should then force the driver to slow down, not floor it. Just closing that gap up where Rosberg rejoined, would suffice though