- 1,516
- Florida
- MARCUSH17
- MARCUSH16
Oh Martin Brundle.
'So how bad do you feel? You've had a Monaco win ripped away from you.'
Don't sugar the pill, Martin.
Read that, then looked at you avatar. Laughed uncontrollably. It compliments your post.
Oh Martin Brundle.
'So how bad do you feel? You've had a Monaco win ripped away from you.'
Don't sugar the pill, Martin.
Words are words, you can see the sense of acheivement he feels.Rosberg admitted a number of times it was luck and said Lewis was better than him today!? What more do you want him to do?
Huge point loss for Hamilton in championship that may end up costing him the championship. I think he has something to be upset over, on for a dominant win, team gamble on 1-2 and race win for Lewis without a comfortable gap and without competitor pitting. Would have been better for Lewis to get call not to change tyres and just do a drive through if no Ferrari crew out in pits if they are so marginal and so crazy to risk it.Mercedes have given Lewis a totally dominant car, a $150,000,000 deal... he's got nothing really to get upset up over. It's ONE race, he still finished on the podium, people are acting like it's cost him the championship.
The SKY coverage is sickening.... makes me embarrassed to be an Englishman.
Not like this though this was a 100% Mercedes created situation.
DRIVERS TO WIN THREE MONACO GPs IN A ROW:Words are words, you can see the sense of acheivement he feels.
That is what im talking about.
I find Nico Rosberg's spanish even funnierDaniil Kvyats spanish is also kinda funny.
Why? he did win the race, doesn't matter the way he won, winning is winning.DRIVERS TO WIN THREE MONACO GPs IN A ROW:
Graham Hill
Alain Prost
Ayrton Senna
Nico Rosberg
If I were Rosberg, I would request for my name to be taken off that, lol.
Lol because the car was capable of winning that race in 2013.Like in Malaysia when Rosberg was told to hold position to let Lewis stay in third? That kind of created situation?
The only difference is this was an incredible misjudging of the circumstances.
DRIVERS TO WIN THREE MONACO GPs IN A ROW:
Graham Hill
Alain Prost
Ayrton Senna
Nico Rosberg
If I were Rosberg, I would request for my name to be taken off that, lol.
Lol because the car was capable of winning that race in 2013.
The emotions for 3rd and 1st are not equal.
No, you wouldn't. Also why should he? It's not his fault that they screwed Hamilton's strategy.DRIVERS TO WIN THREE MONACO GPs IN A ROW:
Graham Hill
Alain Prost
Ayrton Senna
Nico Rosberg
If I were Rosberg, I would request for my name to be taken off that, lol.
I find Nico Rosberg's spanish even funnier
Why? he did win the race, doesn't matter the way he won, winning is winning.
Because pitting someone from the lead and certain victory is the same as being told to do something that still requires something for you to do (pass).That has absolutely nothing to do with what you implied.
But yes I agree, Nico should absolutely hand in his license and revoke the win. He totally didn't earn or deserve it, in fact he should have stopped just short of the finish line and given the position to Lewis so he would have only been one position down instead of two.
I'm trying to come with a logical explanation why anyone would even consider asking a leading driver to grab new tires with so few laps to go. Even if Rosberg and Vettel had pitted and Hamilton stayed out, we saw years ago Vettel holding back everyone with ancient rubber.I mean, what was the point of that pitstop anyways? Even if he had gotten out in front of Vettel, what would have guaranteed that Rosberg would let him get ahead?
I'm trying to come with a logical explanation why anyone would even consider asking a leading driver to grab new tires with so few laps to go. Even if Rosberg and Vettel had pitted and Hamilton stayed out, we saw years ago Vettel holding back everyone with ancient rubber.
I'm trying to come with a logical explanation why anyone would even consider asking a leading driver to grab new tires with so few laps to go. Even if Rosberg and Vettel had pitted and Hamilton stayed out, we saw years ago Vettel holding back everyone with ancient rubber.
Mercedes were probably banking on a short safety car period and Hamilton getting out ahead of Vettel. The only reason why they would have brought him in is if they felt that it was necessary to do so.Because pitting someone from the lead and certain victory is the same as being told to do something that still requires something for you to do (pass).
It's not even remotely comparable.
Hindsight makes it look retarded, but even that the time it would of been risky as they are in front without a certainty of being ahead of the 2 cars behind.Mercedes were probably banking on a short safety car period and Hamilton getting out ahead of Vettel. The only reason why they would have brought him in is if they felt that it was necessary to do so.
I find Nico Rosberg's spanish even funnier
Hamilton also had fresher tyres and huge pace advantage over the cars behind for the whole race at that point, all three had good tyres to the end without safety car, let alone with one. The margin I don't think was ever big enough to pit and come out in front, I'm surprised they would gamble and with all data and systems they have, how they got the maths wrong I never know. I was really surprised to see them pitting Lewis, how did he get such a huge gap to Nico to do that I was thinking...I'm trying to come with a logical explanation why anyone would even consider asking a leading driver to grab new tires with so few laps to go. Even if Rosberg and Vettel had pitted and Hamilton stayed out, we saw years ago Vettel holding back everyone with ancient rubber.
Mercedes has no way of knowing what Ferrari would do - especially if one or both made a late call.Hamilton just confirmed that the team said stay out. Hamilton complained about tires and assumed Rosberg and Vettel will pit too.
I guess team didn't tell him they won't