- 1,195
- Germany
Rear wing looked in tact.Not sure how much of the Saudi car could be recycled, likewise this Monaco chassis, there's not much I can see they could salvage from that except maybe the T-Cam and a wheel.
If they would have been on the same strategyIf there hadn't been team orders in Spain, it'd be one point and they'd be 1-2 in the championship.
If they had the same amount of DNFs, the gap would be 36 points.If there hadn't been team orders in Spain, it'd be one point and they'd be 1-2 in the championship.
Because Pérez gains seven and Max loses seven. Though in reality Max would've won without team orders.If they had the same amount of DNFs, the gap would be 36 points.
Also, how does a 15 point gap become a 1 point gap if Perez led the 1-2 in Spain rather than Verstappen? That would make it an 8 point gap.
Hard to say, while he was on fresh rubber, he had no DRS.Because Pérez gains seven and Max loses seven. Though in reality Max would've won without team orders.
It's a 14-point swing. Perez gains seven (18 -> 25), Verstappen loses seven (25 -> 18).Also, how does a 15 point gap become a 1 point gap if Perez led the 1-2 in Spain rather than Verstappen? That would make it an 8 point gap.
I said this last year and honestly if they want to keep this track on the calendar, they should probably turn it into a time attack event. Don't race there because with the current car, that track is not a "race-able" track. Qualifiers on the other hand are quite fun there which I why I think a time attack even might work.Still don't think this track is worthy of being on the calender. This was one of the better modern Monaco races and it was still a highspeed parade. If we absolutely must keep it for tRaDiTiOnS, maybe we should turn this into an exhibition race of sorts. Or hell just give the F1 drivers go karts. 🤣
Right.It's a 14-point swing. Perez gains seven (18 -> 25), Verstappen loses seven (25 -> 18).
Edit: I know it's several hours later, and we don't really observe double-posting etiquette in race threads but...
... I've just read the rejections of the Ferrari protest and I need to double-check that I've read what I think I read.
Ferrari claim both Red Bulls put a portion of their left wheels over the yellow line demarcating pit exit. Red Bull agree that this was the case. The race notes say that the cars must remain fully to the right of that line...
... but the stewards say that the notes are derived from 2021 rules on pit lane exits, where the 2022 ones only say cars may not "cross" the line, so the notes are wrong because they can't override the rules, and as only a bit of the tyre crossed the line the car didn't.
Right?
Albon claims he would've re-passed Charles, so it was quicker to stay in front.Right.
On another note, here are the on-boards of Leclerc being held up
Albon POV, passing just the 21 blue flags/boards.
How has he got away with that?
Albon defended his refusal to make way, saying his slick tyres meant he would have quickly been able to re-pass Leclerc had he let the Ferrari through.
“It’s tricky because we went out on slicks and we had a massive pace advantage,” Albon explained. “It would take three corners to let him past and then I would have been straightaway quick enough to re-overtake him again.
“You get into a position where, in my eyes, for both of us, it was quicker if I just stayed ahead, because I would have pulled away pretty much straight away. So that’s it really.
“It’s one of those awkward situations. But in my eyes it was a bit like if we let him right past we’re going to overtake him straight back again.”
Well that's batcrap nuts then.Right
Red Bull would appear to disagree with that point of view:A different point of view (front not the rear) shows Verstappen actually not hitting the line.
I saw this one on a Instagram story, but can’t see the actual footage somewhere else to share. Perhaps other people can.
The ruling is that the race director's notes were from last year's Sporting Code (Appendix L) not this year's, and that "the Notes issued by the Race Director cannot contradict the Code or the Formula One Sporting Regulations" (despite doing so at every race that's ever happened when it comes to allowing cars to exceed track limits at certain points), so even though part of the tyres did indeed touch and exceed the yellow line and the race notes said not to do that, that rule is from the 2021 Code and the car itself did not "cross" that line as per the 2022 Code.Stipulation:
All parties agreed that Car 1 did have part of its front left and rear left tyre on the left side of the yellow line.
All parties agreed that most of the left front and left rear tyres of that car remained on the yellow line.
From the official FIA statement of the hearing:Red Bull would appear to disagree with that point of view:
The ruling is that the race director's notes were from last year's Sporting Code (Appendix L) not this year's, and that "the Notes issued by the Race Director cannot contradict the Code or the Formula One Sporting Regulations" (despite doing so at every race that's ever happened when it comes to allowing cars to exceed track limits at certain points), so even though part of the tyres did indeed touch and exceed the yellow line and the race notes said not to do that, that rule is from the 2021 Code and the car itself did not "cross" that line as per the 2022 Code.
The document to which I just linked you, yes.From the official FIA statement of the hearing
Yes. As stated twice now, Red Bull's argument was that the 2022 Sporting Code (Appendix L, Ch4) states only that the car may not cross the line, and the car didn't. Ferrari's argument was that the Race Directors Notes (to which I've also linked you) for the 2022 Monaco Grand Prix states that the car must remain to the right of the yellow pit exit line and as the tyres partly touched and exceeded the line it did not.Red Bull’s arguments in defence:
That car 1 was still to the right of the yellow line.
That in any case, there was no breach of the International Sporting Code.
Checo letting it known he's signed a deal with Red Bull, apparently.
The worst kept secret in the F1 paddock since Sunday: Sergio Perez signed a new contract in Monaco last weekend. After two one-year contracts, now a two-year deal for the Mexican at Red Bull. So until 2024. #F1
He already gave him a photo of his butt...Also, Bono was on radio to Lewis after Alonso took off to keep Ocon back for Valtteri & Vettel. Apparently, Valtteri's engineer proclaimed they owed Lewis a beer for it.
Not the point. Not even close.…so regardless of what camera angles you think there are that show the tyres didn't touch or exceed the line, they did.
Yes, the point. You said it didn't happen. Red Bull itself did. It's in the document I linked you to which you then referred to while ignoring it:Not the point. Not even close.
I don't even know why you're continuing to argue the toss. Red Bull's argument wasn't that it didn't happen; it agreed that it did. The argument was that the rules in the Notes didn't apply because it cited an outdated section of the Code.All parties agreed that Car 1 did have part of its front left and rear left tyre on the left side of the
yellow line.
All parties agreed that most of the left front and left rear tyres of that car remained on the yellow
line.
That's Perez, emerging between Schumacher and Sainz (Ferrari "conceded that car 11 did not have any part of its front or rear tyres on the left of the yellow line"). Verstappen came out behind nobody but with Leclerc right up his chuff. Here's the first frame of the three-second video from which that's taken.Insta Real screenshots Verstappen pit exit