- 31,550
- Buckwheat City
- Dennisch
If they control the media, wouldn't it be Los Angeles?
Now that you mention it.
The jews have a home. It is called the East and West coast of the US!
If they control the media, wouldn't it be Los Angeles?
DanoffOf course it doesn't matter. It makes zero difference what the reasons were for the proper landowners to give Israel to those who are now Israelis. It was their choice, because they owned the land. All that matters at this point is that they made that choice.
sumbrownkidCease fire has been declared and is in effect. Both sides claiming victory, while still reserving harsh warnings to each other for future showdowns. Apparently the Obama crew, and Egypt get credit for deescalating this.
Apparently the Obama crew, and Egypt get credit for deescalating this.
MÜLE_9242;7831973Now all Israel has to do is lift the blockade that started all of this, and Gaza can be less like the ghetto they are now!
People keep harping on Israel for the blockade, but yet seemingly leave Egypt out of that criticism as they too are blockading the Gazans.
Yeah. Also, a land border blockade is completely legal. The sea blockade on the other hand is at least questionable - it is legal only if Israel owns the water body between Gaza and international waters or if the ships going there trespass Israeli waters. A country has the right to forbid ships using its waters or people passing through its borders. It might not be ethical given the situation of the citizens in Gaza, but UN cannot act against any country that doesn't explicitly break the international law - and possible actions would be illegal according to the laws.
I believe the sea blockade was legal. A bit stifling but legal.
That's how I recall it... I think the thorny issue was the way that Israel allotted Palestinian marine boundaries... ie by completely overlaying their own boundaries.
The boundaries make/made the blockade legal in the letter of international law but the net effect was a bit fishy. All Israeli fish, obviously.
If Palestine had any interest in commercial activities then maybe the blockade would have been lifted. Many of them in the Strip have no interest in doing anything but giving a safe haven to those terrorists.
We don't send our money to protect Israel. We send our money to keep them from blowing everybody else up. Israel is perfectly capable of defending itself from any military in the region and then some. If we didn't force them to chill out there currently would not be a Gaza, West Bank, they'd probably have their way with Syria and they'd have all sorts of equipment parked at the border of the Sinai peninsula for good measure.Because the USA has no right trying to control the Middle East and sending billions of our tax dollars trying to protect Israel.
http://www.theocracywatch.org/christian_zionism_israel_forms.htm
If Palestine had any interest in commercial activities then maybe the blockade would have been lifted. Many of them in the Strip have no interest in doing anything but giving a safe haven to those terrorists.
Israel has the right to protect itself. That's my opinion.
But if Russia protects itself (from this, for example), it'll be called an agressor.
Israel has the right to protect itself.
That's basically the same as saying that the guards in Auschwitz had the right to protect themselves from the prisoners.Israel has the right to protect itself. That's my opinion.
Until Hamas is removed from power I can't see any sort of resolution. Hamas' rule for Israel is that it shouldn't exist (it is in their charter). Any state of Jewish people is not allowed (possibly no Jews are allowed either). Can't see any deal being done until something changes there.Here's the thing, I think Palestine does too. And, in this case, I think they have the moral right to the land. There seems to be a strong pro-Jewish media bias in the UK, the Palestinian civil losses are hardly mentioned whereas some Israeli funerals are shown live at length.
Pfaw. Old news man. I posted that map 2 years ago.
Really?
Really?
Just wondering: You do realize that the Palestinians rejected the two state partition correct?
Depends who you ask. It's next to impossible to determine. If you look at both sides you will see some errors.What is the basis for both to claim the land as their own ? Who lived there first ? Who made the first declaration ? How far back do we need to look into the past/history of land occupation ?