HeiI haven't been banned yet.
I see a little contradiction there.
Also: grievers case proven?
Actually in my case yes. I would be more satisfied with somebody who beat me in a car I know wasn't given any special treatment.
What annoys me most about the modding is the element of doubt it introduced. If I race online, come in second and see a car pull more g's than what should be possible in the replay, it kind of kills my fun. I sure bet the dude had his fun, but at the expense of mine. If it was a legitimate loss, I still would have had fun because now I can see what he did better than me driver wise. The other way I was cheated out of a win, however insignificant it may have been.
There should not even be this element of doubting someone performance. Sure modders give a rats ass because they use the same weapons. The clean populace on the other hand is slowly driven out of the game. Recent league events have had declining attendance (only an observation). Many say modding revitalized the game, but only for people with the modding mindset. The result is GT5 becoming unattractive for the normal players.
All i can say isJohnnypensoParticipation in league events has been on a steady decline for months, and started long before hybriding.
I fail to see the difference, other than in someone's head, of getting beat by the supercars PD programmed into the game, like the Elise's, NSX's, M3 GTR's etc., and a car that someone turned into one of those, or nearly so.
I have fiddled around with grip and power and chassis swaps and I'm fairly confident in my tuning abilities, and I have yet to create a car that is faster than the current "cheater" cars in the game. Unless someone has found something I've yet to discover, you are just losing to a superior driver. The fact the skin of that car is one you'd normally beat should add a level of excitement to the game, not detract from it.
In other words, if I turn up beside you in a Ford Focus, that happens to be on a Lotus Elise chassis and I beat you, what's the difference between that and losing to the Elise outright, other than when it's beside you on the grid, you can laugh at the Focus and know you'll have a 10 car lead by the first corner? Either way, you lost to the same car, same setup, just with a different body.
What annoys me most about the modding is the element of doubt it introduced. .
if I turn up beside you in a Ford Focus, that happens to be on a Lotus Elise chassis and I beat you, ...
Chrunch HoustonI have a rule in my online lobby: If you win you must retire the car until the PP changes.
First the cheater wins in his Elise. Then the cheater changes into his Focus Elise. Then the cheater changes into his Civic Elise…
These “cars” are lies, and those who drive them are liars. There is no gray area as far as I am concerned. And I’d bet PD is of the same opinion.
Your arbitrary rules have nothing to do with PD, and given the fact that they haven't done anything about hybrids in online lobbies, it's pretty safe to say it's okay with them.
Ok
Well just to inform you. Your lobbies and your rules have nothing to do with the point of them cheating. Also have nothing to do with PD'S rules of your get what I mean. Your rule are made up for your room. Same goes for someone jumping in a race and beating everyone in your room with a red bull. There is not any consequences for those who do that.
Not saying that's it is or is not cheating. Just saying that there's a big difference between your open lobbies and the TT
Chrunch HoustonMy rule only works if PD’s rules are obeyed as well. I enforce my rule and PD needs to enforce theirs.
Oh, and if I ever saw a red bull in my 425pp room, that person would not be there for very long.
...snip...Bring out your best car given the situation and race. The best driver/car/lap combination will win the race. That is a race. To say that you were "lied to" and believe that the other driver held some expected disadvantage means that you under estimated him.
There is the assumption that a driver will do better in a modded car. ...snip...I see it this way, the 2.10 patch made it so that everyone was driving front engine cars with tons of horsepower. Now, those cars are back to being irrelevant (for the most part). ....
This is the exact reason I haven't been in any online lobbies since teh news of them taking actions. 👍It's not safe to say that at all. There are a laundry list of reasons that they may not have dropped the hammer on everyone at once; for starters being that they may have just wanted to see if there was a way to get around the ban after enacting it; so you can't say that just because they haven't done it for normal online use means that they won't.
Agreed, except that the cars that 2.10 made relevant are now relevant again, although they don't have the competitive advantage they had with 2.10. The reason those same cars weren't very good before 2.10 is that they didn't have enough HP to compensate for their lower grip levels. What they needed was a little more grip, not more HP. Now with modding, you can give them some extra grip, with reduced HP to make them handle and have straightline speed more in line with the better cars in the game.
Dozens upon dozens of previously uncompetitive cars are now in the mix, without chassis swaps, just by tweaking the grip levels slightly, again, at the cost of some power. The game has a very narrow range of combinations of grip/hp that are competitive in GT5. Some cars are in the range, the Elise's, NSX's, M3 GTR's etc. Most are not. If you can find that range, modding allows you to bring many more cars into that territory. If everyone embraced it, and worked together to filter out the yo-yo's in their 2500 HP PP breaking cars, it would be an absolute boon to variety on the grid and the whole tuning process in general.
Now with modding, you can give them some extra grip, with reduced HP to make them handle and have straightline speed more in line with the better cars in the game.
Would that be like turning up with Sports Soft tyres when everyone else is on Sports Hards? I can see why people would think that's cheating.
JohnnypensoNope, not even close, sorry.
Yep. Because as others and myself have said it messes with the PP
Chrunch HoustonIsn't it true though that racing super soft tires can be put on a car and not change the PP?
Oh I don't know about those tires. I have never used them. I don't like racing tires anyway. Have no need for them.
But i would think that they wouldn't change the PP just like any other tire. But they are pretty easy to spot.
My question about those tires is... Can they bypass the tire regulations set in a room?
Has anyone tested under say a regulation set to comfort softs. How many of these tires are able to get into that regulation? And do the same for sport softs and racing softs ect.
Chrunch HoustonHow are they easy to spot?
Watch race they should show up.
Or highlighting the person's name. That should be a easy way. Like i said i haven't tried any of these tires since I could be wrong about that
Yes, Racing Super Soft tires will be displayed if the person is using them. I tried it on myself.
Chrunch HoustonSo if I cursor over someone's name in the lobby and they have super soft tires on I will be able to see?
MuoNiuLa , can you confirm that also?
To me its the only thing that turn me off about it. and ive been suspected to hack because i was very competitive with some 550pp cars when hybrid started to become more popular.
But it felt more like a compliment haha
RSS tires can only be used in lobbies with the "unrestricted" tire option and don't affect PP, nor does any other tire. Be a good incentive to switch to race mediums or race hards. 👍