As he made the low payouts worse at the exact same time.Kaz already said they'll make sure they solve the low payouts issue.
He says one thing, does another.
As he made the low payouts worse at the exact same time.Kaz already said they'll make sure they solve the low payouts issue.
I don't care about this nearly as much as I do about real world prices not being reflected in the UCD or Tuning Shop. 100k for a used S2K? 65k for an ITR? A Mk3 Supra for over 100k?
High expectation considering how Sport's release went. Taken out of context once again...Paying $70 for a game & expecting it to be finished is a high expectation?
I'm so glad more expensive products from other companies don't even think of attempting this sort of reasoning if one of their products is underwhelming. If the game still needs polishing, delay it. Stop letting the bean counters force games out prematurely.
Games are more expensive now because that's how Sony wants them... Sport received way more content over time.You'd think that a game priced at 70/80€ would have more content than any other GT game released prior, especially in this day and age - but of course not. We should just wait for more content. Because we are beta testers for Polyphony at this point.
Oh, but they told us they'll deliver a complete product eventually and that we should just take what we got shut our gobs. Screw that. We demand better, we deserve better.
This is not the argument you think it is.High expectation considering how Sport's release went. Taken out of context once again...
Sport had what was advertised for day one, on day one. Yes, it wasn't much, but it's what they said it would have. An online focused eSports game with a race school etc. Yes, they added a bunch of stuff in updates but that was additional on top of what was advertised.High expectation considering how Sport's release went.
I think that you are missing the point.They would only be valuable if you could sell them back to PD for there actual monetary value. There are way better values in gaming then tossing money at a "car" your only going to use for 20/60 minutes then park it in the garage. I just bought 5 complete racing titles from Humble Bundle for $13. Compare that to one $200 car in a $70 game and 1+1=894.
He also said you can sell cars, actually still says that, except you can notAs he made the low payouts worse at the exact same time.
He says one thing, does another.
That happened in GT5 6 and sport so I wised up for gt7There will be people who bought the game for 60 - 80$/€ who will never have the chance to own cars like this in the game, beacause they either dont have the time to grind nor have the money to buy credits in the store, really sad!
But that's why Early Access titles are explicitly labelled as such, so that people who were expecting a complete game don't feel like they were misled.If I'm paying a premium to have "early access" to a game, so be it.
I'm not quite sure you get how the whole time thing works for the rest of us. It's a linear dimension, and we only have the ability to interact with stuff that's in the same instant as us. All that stuff in the future is inaccessible until we catch up to it, and so where certain features and content are added on the time line makes a significant difference to the experience to us mortals who have to experience time linearly.Knowing it'll improve has me not caring to wait for a time at which a delayed title would be more complete. It's all the same in the end. It makes no difference to me.
Businesses love consumers like you. They sell you one thing, give you another, and you just say "Sure OK. Seems good to me".What do I say...
I knew how it would go. They want us to keep playing, so they drip feed us content.
The approach with old cars is the same as with previous main titles. Many cars are hidden in used dealerships. Maybe that concept is outdated in the fast-paced world of today?
I expected endurance races, more longer races, at launch, but they're not there... After hearing more events are to come...I'll wait. I have the game. If I'm paying a premium to have "early access" to a game, so be it.
GT4 and GT5 UCD rotated by the player. GT7 UCD rotates by a real day system that you can't speed the process for.The approach with old cars is the same as with previous main titles. Many cars are hidden in used dealerships. Maybe that concept is outdated in the fast-paced world of today?
No - the intent is to push players to spend more real money on MTX.The intent is to provide players with a sense of pride and accomplishment for unlocking different cars.
I had credits for this, done the grindy way pre patch.I'd love to know what percentage of GT7 players
a.) Have 18.5m credits without MTX's
b.) Are willing to spend all of their hard earned/grinded credits on this particular car
I imagine you're talking about 1% of the 1%ers at that point.
The one positive is that this stuff might be the biggest hope for change. Polyphony will have a ton of data on who is buying what and where those credits are coming from. You'd have thought change will follow if nobody is buying an 18.5m CR McLaren.
That post by @NICKname is a joke, a play on the EA meme.No - the intent is to push players to spend more real money on MTX.
Kaz's statement is full of massive contradictions and is not backed up by the actions they have made.
Look at his statement as a whole, instead of just each paragraph as its own thing and its clear lies to cover up for the money grab.
... Is this^ dude for real? Did he really say this? Can he do any math?Online play spits out credits. Dailies spit out credits. The daily spin gets you credits. It's dribs and drabs, but it adds up.
The other fomo aspect is that given the information we have, these cars when they do roll around again will likely go up in price.So a tiny update, looks like we got slapped in the face by yet another case of it with the Porsche 917K tonight, which is 18 million.
Just a personal bit, but you wanna know why we never complained and raged over 10-20 million CR cars before? Cause they stayed where they are. No urgency. No FOMO (Fear of Missing Out, usually done by going "LIMITED TIME!!" on something, classic business tactic for easy sales numbers.). Just sitting there, waiting for that day where you finally grind up the CR to grab one.
Honestly, to me it's a perfect storm of three elements. Low race payouts compared to costs. FOMO compelling desperate players into spending money. Egregious microtransactions. That storm coming together is what can compel people to such extremes like spending an obscene amount on such cars, and sadly, I just witnessed that exact storm hit some unfortunate soul somewhere else.
Shut the front door. Do not give them any ideas.Speaking of rarity, they should limit the number of McLaren F1s available to 64 units and once they're snatched up by the first 64 whales nobody can own a McLaren F1 anymore.
Yeah, nah. To anyone who isn't an idiot your theory is feasible. Clearly PD are idiots. If somehow in the realms of an alternate reality it was an honest mistake they would have addressed it as soon as it was discovered.I'm wondering if the price of credits is a mistake, like an error in someone's spreadsheet that has got dollars vs cents wrong or something. I honestly can't believe that they think anyone will see $200 for ONE car out of hundreds, in a full price game, as reasonable. I don't care how rich someone is, they could still spend that $200 on something else instead that gives them more value. Even if there are a tiny number of people who will pay that, I struggle to see how the alienation of almost the entire customer base is worth it. It's so hard to comprehend that it being a mistake is the only way I can rationalise it having happened.
This.Imagine saving up all those millions and millions of credits grinding away for that F1 car and it suddenly goes to low stock when you only need a few million left to get it and in your mind you are thinking it could go off sale soon! The limited time would also make people think twice about buying the lower amounts (to top up credit). FOMO.
It takes years and years of sales and growth to build up goodwill to a name/company/franchise but only one comment/bad decision to lose it all even quicker. If PD/Sony don't make a decision here reading the room I can't see them getting this goodwill back from their customers and they will have to build the trust again which can take many years.
This is happening just now, checking on metacritic this morning (I'm in Italy) the score is 2.0 , most of the negative comments are well motivated ..Imagine saving up all those millions and millions of credits grinding away for that F1 car and it suddenly goes to low stock when you only need a few million left to get it and in your mind you are thinking it could go off sale soon! The limited time would also make people think twice about buying the lower amounts (to top up credit). FOMO.
It takes years and years of sales and growth to build up goodwill to a name/company/franchise but only one comment/bad decision to lose it all even quicker. If PD/Sony don't make a decision here reading the room I can't see them getting this goodwill back from their customers and they will have to build the trust again which can take many years.